On 2017年06月16日 20:33, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 10:43:15AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I see a lot of warnings from btrfs/094
[13458.628334] BTRFS warning (device sdb6): unhandled fiemap cache detected:
offset=581632 phys=13078528 len=4096 flags=0x800
[13458.644183] BTRFS warning (device sdb6): unhandled fiemap cache detected:
offset=864256 phys=13299712 len=4096 flags=0x800
[13458.660097] BTRFS warning (device sdb6): unhandled fiemap cache detected:
offset=1138688 phys=13504512 len=4096 flags=0x0
[13458.675846] BTRFS warning (device sdb6): unhandled fiemap cache detected:
offset=1462272 phys=13733888 len=4096 flags=0x800
...
about 1000 in total from a fstest run.
Strangely, I can't reproduce it either on my original branch (v4.12 with
this patch), or torvalds/master (this patch is already merged with your
renaming)
Also I'm enabling CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG, so when the btrfs_warn() is
triggered, it should cause the test case to fail.
However I tried all btrfs/09*, nothing happened.
Is some other out-of-tree patch causing the problem?
If so, which branch are you testing? I think I could help to fix it.
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
