On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Filipe,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:47:21AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com> wrote:
>> > There is a cornel case that slip through the checkers in functions
>> > reading extent buffer, ie.
>> >
>> > if (start < eb->len) and (start + len > eb->len),
>> > then
>> >
>> > a) map_private_extent_buffer() returns immediately because
>> > it's thinking the range spans across two pages,
>> >
>> > b) and the checkers in read_extent_buffer(), WARN_ON(start > eb->len)
>> > and WARN_ON(start + len > eb->start + eb->len), both are OK in this
>> > corner case, but it'd actually try to access the eb->pages out of
>> > bounds because of (start + len > eb->len).
>> >
>> > The case is found by switching extent inline ref type from shared data
>> > ref to non-shared data ref.
>> >
>> > This is adding proper checks in order to avoid invalid memory access,
>> > ie. 'general protection', before it's too late.
>>
>> Hi Bo,
>>
>> I don't understand these 2 last paragraphs.
>> How do you fix the invalid memory access? All the change does is make
>> sure that attempts to read from invalid regions of an extent buffer
>> result in a warning and returning an error code. Those paragraphs give
>> the idea that the problem is that some caller is passing a wrong
>> offset/length pair, however you aren't fixing any caller. can you
>> clarify?
>>
>
> I see your doubt, that wrong offset/length pair comes from one of
> btrfs_setget helpers, eg. btrfs_extent_data_ref_root.
>
> The invalid memory access happens when the pointer it's using to
> access fields in "struct btrfs_extent_data_ref" is actually a "struct
> btrfs_shared_data_ref", this is caused by switching those types.
>
> So the offset/length pair is correct from btrfs_setget helper's point
> of view, but it's just using the wrong helper due to a wrong ref type
> (in v2 this'll be added to the commit log to clarity).
>
>> Also when you say " The case is found by switching extent inline ref
>> type from shared data ref to non-shared data ref", it gives the idea
>> this is a deterministic problem that always happens when doing that
>> switch. If so, can we have a test case?
>>
>
> It is deterministic, but it depends on patching btrfs-corrupt-block
> and last time I posted a corrupt-block related case, I was told that
> tool is gonna change a lot and maybe get deleted in the near future,
> so it's not yet suitable for fstests cases.

Ok, so this only happens if the metadata is corrupted. It wasn't clear
for me from the change log.

Thanks.

>
>> Also missing the word "fault" after 'general protection'.
>>
>
> Yeah, there is a 'fault', the full text is
> "general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN",
> will update.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -liubo
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
>> > ---
>> >  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> > index 0aff9b2..d198e87 100644
>> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> > @@ -5416,13 +5416,19 @@ void read_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb, 
>> > void *dstv,
>> >         char *dst = (char *)dstv;
>> >         size_t start_offset = eb->start & ((u64)PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>> >         unsigned long i = (start_offset + start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> > +       unsigned long num_pages = num_extent_pages(eb->start, eb->len);
>> >
>> > -       WARN_ON(start > eb->len);
>> > -       WARN_ON(start + len > eb->start + eb->len);
>> > +       if (start + len > eb->len) {
>> > +               WARN(1, KERN_ERR "btrfs bad mapping eb start %llu len %lu, 
>> > wanted %lu %lu\n",
>> > +                    eb->start, eb->len, start, len);
>> > +               memset(dst, 0, len);
>> > +               return;
>> > +       }
>> >
>> >         offset = (start_offset + start) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>> >
>> >         while (len > 0) {
>> > +               ASSERT(i < num_pages);
>> >                 page = eb->pages[i];
>> >
>> >                 cur = min(len, (PAGE_SIZE - offset));
>> > @@ -5491,6 +5497,12 @@ int map_private_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer 
>> > *eb, unsigned long start,
>> >         unsigned long end_i = (start_offset + start + min_len - 1) >>
>> >                 PAGE_SHIFT;
>> >
>> > +       if (start + min_len > eb->len) {
>> > +               WARN(1, KERN_ERR "btrfs bad mapping eb start %llu len %lu, 
>> > wanted %lu %lu\n",
>> > +                      eb->start, eb->len, start, min_len);
>> > +               return -EINVAL;
>> > +       }
>> > +
>> >         if (i != end_i)
>> >                 return 1;
>> >
>> > @@ -5502,12 +5514,6 @@ int map_private_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer 
>> > *eb, unsigned long start,
>> >                 *map_start = ((u64)i << PAGE_SHIFT) - start_offset;
>> >         }
>> >
>> > -       if (start + min_len > eb->len) {
>> > -               WARN(1, KERN_ERR "btrfs bad mapping eb start %llu len %lu, 
>> > wanted %lu %lu\n",
>> > -                      eb->start, eb->len, start, min_len);
>> > -               return -EINVAL;
>> > -       }
>> > -
>> >         p = eb->pages[i];
>> >         kaddr = page_address(p);
>> >         *map = kaddr + offset;
>> > --
>> > 2.9.4
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>>
>> “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to