Am Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:04:14 +0000 schrieb "Fuhrmann, Carsten" <carsten.fuhrm...@rwth-aachen.de>:
> Well the correct translation for "Laufzeit" is runtime and not > latency. But thank you for that hint, I'll change it to "gesamt > Laufzeit" to make it more clear. How about better translating it to English in the first place as you're trying to reach an international community? Also, it would be nice to put the exact test you did as a command line or configuration file, so it can be replayed on other systems, and - most important - by the developers, to easily uncover what is causing the behavior... > Best regards > > Carsten > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Andrei Borzenkov [mailto:arvidj...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. September 2017 18:43 > An: Fuhrmann, Carsten <carsten.fuhrm...@rwth-aachen.de>; Qu Wenruo > <quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: > AW: Btrfs performance with small blocksize on SSD > > 24.09.2017 16:53, Fuhrmann, Carsten пишет: > > Hello, > > > > 1) > > I used direct write (no page cache) but I didn't disable the Disk > > cache of the HDD/SSD itself. In all tests I wrote 1GB and looked > > for the runtime of that write process. > > So "latency" on your diagram means total time to write 1GiB file? > That is highly unusual meaning for "latency" which normally means > time to perform single IO. If so, you should better rename Y-axis to > something like "total run time". > N_____r__y____b_X____v_^_)__{.n_+____{_n___)____w* jg___ _______j/___z_____2_______&_)___a____ _G___h__j:+v___w____ -- Regards, Kai Replies to list-only preferred. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
