On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:29:56PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> The use of sector_t is not necessry, it's just for a warning. Switch to
> u64 and rename the variable. The messages are adjusted as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index e3f6c49e5c4d..34ea2e7048c2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ struct scrub_warning {
>       struct btrfs_path       *path;
>       u64                     extent_item_size;
>       const char              *errstr;
> -     sector_t                sector;
> +     u64                     physical;
>       u64                     logical;
>       struct btrfs_device     *dev;
>  };
> @@ -797,10 +797,10 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 
> offset, u64 root,
>        */
>       for (i = 0; i < ipath->fspath->elem_cnt; ++i)
>               btrfs_warn_in_rcu(fs_info,
> -                               "%s at logical %llu on dev %s, sector %llu, 
> root %llu, inode %llu, offset %llu, length %llu, links %u (path: %s)",
> +"%s at logical %llu on dev %s, physical %llu, root %llu, inode %llu, offset 
> %llu, length %llu, links %u (path: %s)",
>                                 swarn->errstr, swarn->logical,
>                                 rcu_str_deref(swarn->dev->name),
> -                               (unsigned long long)swarn->sector,
> +                               swarn->physical,
>                                 root, inum, offset,
>                                 min(isize - offset, (u64)PAGE_SIZE), nlink,
>                                 (char *)(unsigned long)ipath->fspath->val[i]);
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 
> offset, u64 root,
>                         "%s at logical %llu on dev %s, sector %llu, root 
> %llu, inode %llu, offset %llu: path resolving failed with ret=%d",
>                         swarn->errstr, swarn->logical,
>                         rcu_str_deref(swarn->dev->name),
> -                       (unsigned long long)swarn->sector,
> +                       swarn->physical,
>                         root, inum, offset, ret);
>  
>       free_ipath(ipath);
> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, 
> struct scrub_block *sblock)
>       if (!path)
>               return;
>  
> -     swarn.sector = (sblock->pagev[0]->physical) >> 9;
> +     swarn.physical = sblock->pagev[0]->physical;
>       swarn.logical = sblock->pagev[0]->logical;
>       swarn.errstr = errstr;
>       swarn.dev = NULL;
> @@ -868,10 +868,10 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, 
> struct scrub_block *sblock)
>                                                     item_size, &ref_root,
>                                                     &ref_level);
>                       btrfs_warn_in_rcu(fs_info,
> -                             "%s at logical %llu on dev %s, sector %llu: 
> metadata %s (level %d) in tree %llu",
> +"%s at logical %llu on dev %s, physical %llu: metadata %s (level %d) in tree 
> %llu",
>                               errstr, swarn.logical,
>                               rcu_str_deref(dev->name),
> -                             (unsigned long long)swarn.sector,
> +                             swarn.physical,
>                               ref_level ? "node" : "leaf",
>                               ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_level,
>                               ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_root);

I've got used to ambiguous physical/logical, so not a problem for me.

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]>

-liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to