If one of btrfs's devices was pulled out and we've replaced it with a
new one, then they have the same uuid.

If that device gets reconnected, 'btrfs filesystem show' will show the
stale one instead of the new one, but on kernel side btrfs has a fix
to not include the stale one, this could confuse users as people may
monitor btrfs by running that cli.

This does the similar thing to what kernel side has done.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
---
 volumes.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 2f3943d..c7b7a41 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -138,7 +138,20 @@ static int device_list_add(const char *path,
                list_add(&device->dev_list, &fs_devices->devices);
                device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
        } else if (!device->name || strcmp(device->name, path)) {
-               char *name = strdup(path);
+               char *name;
+
+               /*
+                * The existing device has newer generation, so this
+                * one could be a stale one, don't add it.
+                */
+               if (found_transid < device->generation) {
+                       warning("adding device %s gen %llu but found a existing 
device %s gen %llu\n",
+                               path, found_transid, device->name,
+                               device->generation, found_transid);
+                       return -EEXIST;
+               }
+
+               name = strdup(path);
                 if (!name)
                         return -ENOMEM;
                 kfree(device->name);
-- 
2.9.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to