New test case to test if the minimal device size given by "mkfs.btrfs" failure case is valid.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> --- tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..f55760df061f --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/010-small-image/test.sh @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# test if the reported minimal size of mkfs.btrfs is valid + +source "$TOP"/tests/common + +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs +check_prereq btrfs + +setup_root_helper + +do_test() +{ + # Well, 1M small enough to fail, we just use the output + # to get the minimal device size + prepare_test_dev 1M + output=$(run_mustfail_stdout "mkfs.btrfs for small image" \ + "$TOP"/mkfs.btrfs -f $@ "$TEST_DEV") + good_size=$(echo "$output" | grep -oP "(?<=is )\d+") + + prepare_test_dev "$good_size" + run_check "$TOP"/mkfs.btrfs -f $@ "$TEST_DEV" + run_check $SUDO_HELPER mount "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_MNT" + run_check $SUDO_HELPER umount "$TEST_MNT" +} + +do_test -n 4k -m single -d single +do_test -n 4k -m single -d dup +do_test -n 4k -m dup -d single +do_test -n 4k -m dup -d dup + +do_test -n 8k -m single -d single +do_test -n 8k -m single -d dup +do_test -n 8k -m dup -d single +do_test -n 8k -m dup -d dup + +do_test -n 16k -m single -d single +do_test -n 16k -m single -d dup +do_test -n 16k -m dup -d single +do_test -n 16k -m dup -d dup + +do_test -n 32k -m single -d single +do_test -n 32k -m single -d dup +do_test -n 32k -m dup -d single +do_test -n 32k -m dup -d dup + +do_test -n 64k -m single -d single +do_test -n 64k -m single -d dup +do_test -n 64k -m dup -d single +do_test -n 64k -m dup -d dup -- 2.14.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
