On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 06:04:43PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 22-11-17 16:15:58, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> > 
> > We are converting the writeback counters to use bytes instead of pages,
> > so we need to make the batch size for the percpu modifications align
> > properly with the new units.  Since we used pages before, just multiply
> > by PAGE_SIZE to get the equivalent bytes for the batch size.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> 
> Looks good to me, just please make this part of patch 5/11. Otherwise
> bisection may get broken by too large errors in per-cpu counters of IO
> completions... Thanks!
> 
>                                                               Honza
> 
> > ---
> >  lib/flex_proportions.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> > index 2cc1f94e03a1..b0343ae71f5e 100644
> > --- a/lib/flex_proportions.c
> > +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void fprop_fraction_single(struct fprop_global *p,
> >  /*
> >   * ---- PERCPU ----
> >   */
> > -#define PROP_BATCH (8*(1+ilog2(nr_cpu_ids)))
> > +#define PROP_BATCH (8*PAGE_SIZE*(1+ilog2(nr_cpu_ids)))

So when the patch is going to be updated, please fix the coding style here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to