This seems to have picked up wrong patch for testing, it should use [1], a set of 3 patches.
[1] [PATCH V4 0/3] Add missing flags in the kernel Thanks, Anand On 01/17/2018 08:45 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): commit: d1f6ad52c3f93a9da45e11001e0a0be8f3c31e9e ("btrfs: add support for SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID in btrfs.ko") url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Anand-Jain/btrfs-add-missing-BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG-define/20180109-041023 base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next in testcase: aim7 with following parameters: disk: 4BRD_12G md: RAID1 fs: btrfs test: disk_src load: 500 cpufreq_governor: performance test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system. test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/ on test machine: 40 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz with 384G memory caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace): [ 25.285253] BTRFS error (device md0): SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID is set [ 25.285255] BTRFS error (device md0): superblock contains fatal errors To reproduce: git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git cd lkp-tests bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email bin/lkp run job.yaml Thanks, Xiaolong
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html