Cleanup the following things:
1) open coded SZ_16M round up
2) use min() to replace open-coded size comparison
3) code style

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index cb0a8d27661b..90ad716d2b50 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4761,18 +4761,17 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct 
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
         * and compare that answer with the max chunk size
         */
        if (stripe_size * data_stripes > max_chunk_size) {
-               u64 mask = (1ULL << 24) - 1;
-
                stripe_size = div_u64(max_chunk_size, data_stripes);
 
                /* bump the answer up to a 16MB boundary */
-               stripe_size = (stripe_size + mask) & ~mask;
+               stripe_size = round_up(stripe_size, SZ_16M);
 
-               /* but don't go higher than the limits we found
+               /*
+                * but don't go higher than the limits we found
                 * while searching for free extents
                 */
-               if (stripe_size > devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail)
-                       stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail;
+               stripe_size = min(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail,
+                                 stripe_size);
        }
 
        stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes);
-- 
2.16.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to