On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:50:32AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:13:38PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:50:48PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > I have more comments or maybe questions about the future development
> > > workflow, but at this point the patchset is in a good shape for
> > > incremental merge.
> > After removnig the first patch adding subvolume.c (with
> > linux/btrfs_tree.h) and what depends on it, I'm left with:
> > Omar Sandoval (4):
> > Add libbtrfsutil
> > libbtrfsutil: add Python bindings
> > libbtrfsutil: add qgroup inheritance helpers
> > libbtrfsutil: add filesystem sync helpers
> > with some context updates. That builds and passes the CI tests.
> Great. Does the CI system run the Python tests yet?
Tested here https://travis-ci.org/kdave/btrfs-progs/jobs/345410536 ,
does not pass.
test_start_sync (test_filesystem.TestSubvolume) ... mkfs.btrfs: invalid option
usage: mkfs.btrfs [options] dev [ dev ... ]
Looks like it tries to use the system mkfs.btrfs that is old.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html