From: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>

ARM64 doesn't walk the VMA tree in its flush_dcache_page()
implementation, so has no need to take the tree_lock.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h 
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index bef9f418f089..550b0abea953 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -137,10 +137,8 @@ static inline void __flush_icache_all(void)
        dsb(ish);
 }
 
-#define flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping) \
-       spin_lock_irq(&(mapping)->tree_lock)
-#define flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping) \
-       spin_unlock_irq(&(mapping)->tree_lock)
+#define flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping)                do { } while (0)
+#define flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping)      do { } while (0)
 
 /*
  * We don't appear to need to do anything here.  In fact, if we did, we'd
-- 
2.16.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to