On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Andrew Morton
> <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> Replacing the __builtin_choose_expr() with ?: works of course.
> Hmm. That sounds like the right thing to do. We were so myopically
> staring at the __builtin_choose_expr() problem that we overlooked the
> obvious solution.
> Using __builtin_constant_p() together with a ?: is in fact our common
> pattern, so that should be fine. The only real reason to use
> __builtin_choose_expr() is if you want to get the *type* to vary
> depending on which side you choose, but that's not an issue for
> min/max.

This doesn't solve it for -Wvla, unfortunately. That was the point of
Josh's original suggestion of __builtin_choose_expr().

Try building with KCFLAGS=-Wval and checking net/ipv6/proc.c:

net/ipv6/proc.c: In function ‘snmp6_seq_show_item’:
net/ipv6/proc.c:198:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids array ‘buff’ whose
size can’t be evaluated [-Wvla]
  unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];


Kees Cook
Pixel Security
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to