When looping btrfs/074 with many cpus (>= 8), it's possible to trigger
kernel warning due to first key verification:
[ 4239.523446] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 2381 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:460
btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.523830] Modules linked in:
[ 4239.524630] RIP: 0010:btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.527101] Call Trace:
[ 4239.527251] read_tree_block+0x42/0x70
[ 4239.527434] read_node_slot+0xd2/0x110
[ 4239.527632] push_leaf_right+0xad/0x1b0
[ 4239.527809] split_leaf+0x4ea/0x700
[ 4239.527988] ? leaf_space_used+0xbc/0xe0
[ 4239.528192] ? btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x99/0xb0
[ 4239.528416] btrfs_search_slot+0x8cc/0xa40
[ 4239.528605] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x71/0xc0
[ 4239.528798] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xa98/0x1680
[ 4239.529013] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x10b/0x1b0
[ 4239.529205] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x33/0xaf0
[ 4239.529445] ? start_transaction+0xa8/0x4f0
[ 4239.529630] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1b0/0x4e0
[ 4239.529833] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x54/0xa0
[ 4239.530045] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x25/0x70
[ 4239.531907] btrfs_direct_IO+0x233/0x3d0
[ 4239.532098] generic_file_direct_write+0xcb/0x170
[ 4239.532296] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x2bb/0x5f4
[ 4239.532491] aio_write+0xe2/0x180
[ 4239.532669] ? lock_acquire+0xac/0x1e0
[ 4239.532839] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[ 4239.533032] do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533223] ? do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533398] SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533560] ? SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533729] do_syscall_64+0x75/0x1d0
[ 4239.533979] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
[ 4239.534182] RIP: 0033:0x7f8519741697
The problem here is, at btree_read_extent_buffer_pages() we don't have
acquired read/write lock on that extent buffer, only basic info like
level/bytenr is reliable.
So race condition leads to such false alert.
However in current call site, it's impossible to acquire proper lock
without race window.
To fix the problem, we only verify first key for committed tree blocks
(whose generation is no larger than fs_info->last_trans_committed), so
the content of such tree blocks will not change and there is no need to
get read/write lock.
Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
Fixes: 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 07b5e6f7df67..23803102aa0d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -449,6 +449,14 @@ static int verify_level_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (!first_key)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * For live tree block (new tree blocks in current transaction),
+ * we need proper lock context to avoid race, which is impossible here.
+ * So we only checks tree blocks which is read from disk, whose
+ * generation <= fs_info->last_trans_committed.
+ */
+ if (btrfs_header_generation(eb) > fs_info->last_trans_committed)
+ return 0;
if (found_level)
btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
else
--
2.17.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
