On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the >> remaining patches. >> >> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get >> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed >> until inode reserved space is freed. >> >> This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail. >> >> Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset? > > For the record: patch 9 and 10 are now in misc next and will go to 4.17. > I need to let them through the for-next and other testing, so it will be > some of the post rc1 pull requests.
I still saw qgroup related xfstests (btrfs/022 etc.) fails in current misc-next branch which includes 9th and 10th patches. I noticed 5th patch in the tree (already in v4.17-rc1) is older version and this seems the reason that the tests still fails. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html