On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
>> remaining patches.
>>
>> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
>> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed
>> until inode reserved space is freed.
>>
>> This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail.
>>
>> Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset?
> 
> For the record: patch 9 and 10 are now in misc next and will go to 4.17.
> I need to let them through the for-next and other testing, so it will be
> some of the post rc1 pull requests.

I still saw qgroup related xfstests (btrfs/022 etc.) fails in current misc-next 
branch
which includes 9th and 10th patches.

I noticed 5th patch in the tree (already in v4.17-rc1) is older version and this
seems the reason that the tests still fails.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to