On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote: > On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the > >> remaining patches. > >> > >> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get > >> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed > >> until inode reserved space is freed. > >> > >> This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail. > >> > >> Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset? > > > > For the record: patch 9 and 10 are now in misc next and will go to 4.17. > > I need to let them through the for-next and other testing, so it will be > > some of the post rc1 pull requests. > > I still saw qgroup related xfstests (btrfs/022 etc.) fails in current > misc-next branch > which includes 9th and 10th patches. > > I noticed 5th patch in the tree (already in v4.17-rc1) is older version and > this > seems the reason that the tests still fails.
Qu, can you please have a look a send an incremental fixup? Handling of this patchset was not very good from my side, I should have asked for a fresh resend as I applied the changes from mailinglist and not from git. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
