On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:20:49PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote: > Use btrfs_delete_subvolume() to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). > The permission check is still done in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). Also, > call of d_delete() is still required since btrfs_delete_subvolume() > does not call it. > > As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol() > become static functions. No functional change happens. > > Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Why is this still split into two patches? Factoring out a function should happen in one patch, ie 2 and 3 in one go. Do you have a reason not to do it like that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
