On 04/20/2018 11:15 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:32:03PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:On 04/19/2018 05:38 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:Although we have already checked incompat flags manually before really mounting it, we could still enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() to check incompat flags for later write time super block validation check. This patch adds such incompat flags check for btrfs_check_super_valid(), currently it won't be triggered, but provides the basis for later write time check. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 60caa68c3618..ec123158f051 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -4104,6 +4104,19 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) ret = -EINVAL; }+ /*+ * Before calling btrfs_check_super_valid() we have already checked + * incompat flags. So if we developr new incompat flags, it's must be + * some corruption. + */ + if (btrfs_super_incompat_flags(sb) & ~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP) { + btrfs_err(fs_info, + "corrupted incompat flags detected 0x%llx, supported 0x%llx",2707 features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super) & 2708 ~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP; 2709 if (features) { 2710 btrfs_err(fs_info, 2711 "cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (%llx)", 2712 features); 2713 err = -EINVAL; 2714 goto fail_alloc; 2715 }So there's a "user experience" change, now that you pointed out theother check.
Its a regression.
If a filesystem with incompat bits set will be mounted,
this will say 'you have corrupted filesystem', which is not IMO what we
want to tell.
Tough the extended btrfs_check_super_valid could catch the corrupted
incompat bits, what we need at mount time is wording from the 2nd
message ("cannot mount unsuppported features").
I think that there should be a separate function that does the
pre-commit checks, calls btrfs_check_super_valid and also validates the
incompat bit.
We can still print it as 'unsupported optional features', which would imply corruption in the non-mount context. Thanks, Anand
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
