On 07/12/2018 02:23 PM, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
fs_devices is always passed to btrfs_scan_one_device which
overrides it. And in the call stack below fs_devices is passed to
btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_mount_root.
And in btrfs_mount_root the output fs_devices of this call stack
is not used.
btrfs_mount_root
        -> btrfs_parse_early_options
                ->btrfs_scan_one_device
So, there is no necessary to pass fs_devices from btrfs_mount_root,
use a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_options is enough.

Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
---

Changelog:
v4: changed a line warp, and adjusted the order of two rows.
v3: rebase to misc-next.
v2: deal with Nikolay's comment, make changelog more clair.

  fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 39d8e39b2fe1..44f58bdb5fa6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -884,10 +884,11 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, char 
*options,
   * only when we need to allocate a new super block.
   */
  static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
-               void *holder, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices)
+                                     void *holder)
  {
        substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
        char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
+       struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
        int error = 0;
if (!options)
@@ -916,7 +917,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, 
fmode_t flags,
                                goto out;
                        }
                        error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
-                                       flags, holder, fs_devices);
+                                       flags, holder, &fs_devices);

1.
 Extend line until 8-char, and remain to start below the (.

-                       error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
-                                       flags, holder, fs_devices);
+                       error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
+                                                     holder, &fs_devices);


2.
Fixed the conflict on top of the recent uuid_mutex changes from David.

I see this patch isn't in the misc-next yet, applied to my local WS,
pending pull request.

Thanks, Anand

                        kfree(device_name);
                        if (error)
                                goto out;
@@ -1524,8 +1525,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct 
file_system_type *fs_type,
        if (!(flags & SB_RDONLY))
                mode |= FMODE_WRITE;
- error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type,
-                                         &fs_devices);
+       error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type);
        if (error) {
                return ERR_PTR(error);
        }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to