On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 07:37:46PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Here are a bunch of patches which cleanup extraneous fs_info parameters to 
> function which already take a structure that holds a reference to the 
> fs_info. 
> 
> Except for patches 4 and 5, everything else is correct - due to those 
> functions
> always taking a transaction. 4 and 5 in turn reference the fs_info from 
> struct btrfs_device. Inspecting the callers I managed to convince myself that 
> those function are always called with well-formed btrfs_device i.e one which 
> has its fs_info member initialised. Reviewers might want to pay extra 
> attention to that but otherwise they are trivial. 

4 and 5 look good to me, a device without a valid fs_info has a short
timespan and should not appear anywhere besides the helpers that set up
fs_devices etc. Series added to misc-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to