On 30.08.2018 20:41, Josef Bacik wrote:
> For enospc_debug having the block rsvs is super helpful to see if we've
> done something wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 80615a579b18..df826f713034 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -7910,6 +7910,15 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct
> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void dump_block_rsv(struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&rsv->lock);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%d: size %llu reserved %llu\n",
> + rsv->type, (unsigned long long)rsv->size,
> + (unsigned long long)rsv->reserved);
> + spin_unlock(&rsv->lock);
> +}
There was feedback on this hunk which you seem to have ignored:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg80473.html
> +
> static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct btrfs_space_info *info, u64 bytes,
> int dump_block_groups)
> @@ -7929,6 +7938,12 @@ static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info
> *fs_info,
> info->bytes_readonly);
> spin_unlock(&info->lock);
>
> + dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->global_block_rsv);
> + dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->trans_block_rsv);
> + dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->chunk_block_rsv);
> + dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->delayed_block_rsv);
> + dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv);
> +
> if (!dump_block_groups)
> return;
>
>
