On 2018/7/16 11:39 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 03:47:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Hello,
Here is a series which adds support for delayed refs. This is needed to enable
later work on adding freespace tree repair code. Additionally, it results in
more code sharing between kernel/user space.

Patches 1-9 are simple prep patches removing some arguments, causing problems
later. They can go independently of the delayed refs work. They don't introduce
any functional changes. Next, patches 10-13 introduce the needed infrastructure
to for delayed refs without actually activating it. Patch 14 finally wires it
up by adding the necessary call outs to btrfs_run_delayed refs and reworking the
extent addition/freeing functions. With all of this done, patch 15 finally
removes the old code.

This series passes all btrfs progs fsck and misc tests + fuzz tests apart from
fuzz-003/007/009 - but those fail without this series so it's unlikely it's
caused by it.

Nikolay Borisov (15):
   btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from pin_down_bytes
   btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from btrfs_del_csums
   btrfs-progs: Add functions to modify the used space by a root
   btrfs-progs: Refactor the root used bytes are updated
   btrfs-progs: Make update_block_group take fs_info instead of root
   btrfs-progs: check: Drop trans/root arguments from free_extent_hook
   btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from __free_extent
   btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from alloc_reserved_tree_block
   btrfs-progs: Always pass 0 for offset when calling btrfs_free_extent
     for btree blocks.
   btrfs-progs: Add boolean to signal whether we are re-initing extent
     tree
   btrfs-progs: Add delayed refs infrastructure
   btrfs-progs: Add __free_extent2 function
   btrfs-progs: Add alloc_reserved_tree_block2 function
   btrfs-progs: Wire up delayed refs
   btrfs-progs: Remove old delayed refs infrastructure

Added to devel. There were some patch-to-patch compilation issues,
function alloc_reserved_tree_block2 used earlier than defined so I
reordered the patches to fix that.

The CI fails at test check/020-extent-ref-cases but it works on my
machine so it's not caused by the patchset.

Hi, David
Actually, now kdave/devel still fails at fsck-tests/020 due to
version 1st of this patchset. See the thread please
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg81675.html

Nikolay's V2 patchset should slove the problem.
You may have known the situation, this mail is just a gentle reminder :).

Thanks,
Su
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to