On 3.12.18 г. 17:20 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> Over the years we have built up a lot of infrastructure to keep delayed
> refs in check, mostly by running them at btrfs_end_transaction() time.
> We have a lot of different maths we do to figure out how much, if we
> should do it inline or async, etc. This existed because we had no
> feedback mechanism to force the flushing of delayed refs when they
> became a problem. However with the enospc flushing infrastructure in
> place for flushing delayed refs when they put too much pressure on the
> enospc system we have this problem solved. Rip out all of this code as
> it is no longer needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 38 --------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> index 2d8401bf8df9..01f39401619a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> @@ -798,22 +798,12 @@ static int should_end_transaction(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> int btrfs_should_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> {
> struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
> - int updates;
> - int err;
>
> smp_mb();
> if (cur_trans->state >= TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED ||
> cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing)
> return 1;
>
> - updates = trans->delayed_ref_updates;
> - trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0;
> - if (updates) {
> - err = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, updates * 2);
> - if (err) /* Error code will also eval true */
> - return err;
> - }
> -
> return should_end_transaction(trans);
> }
>
> @@ -843,11 +833,8 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *info = trans->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
> - u64 transid = trans->transid;
> - unsigned long cur = trans->delayed_ref_updates;
> int lock = (trans->type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK);
> int err = 0;
> - int must_run_delayed_refs = 0;
>
> if (refcount_read(&trans->use_count) > 1) {
> refcount_dec(&trans->use_count);
> @@ -858,27 +845,6 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
> trans->block_rsv = NULL;
>
> - if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs))
> - btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans);
Is this being deleted because in delayed_refs_rsv you account also fo
new block groups?
> -
> - trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0;
> - if (!trans->sync) {
> - must_run_delayed_refs =
> - btrfs_should_throttle_delayed_refs(trans);
> - cur = max_t(unsigned long, cur, 32);
> -
> - /*
> - * don't make the caller wait if they are from a NOLOCK
> - * or ATTACH transaction, it will deadlock with commit
> - */
> - if (must_run_delayed_refs == 1 &&
> - (trans->type & (__TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK | __TRANS_ATTACH)))
> - must_run_delayed_refs = 2;
> - }
> -
> - btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
> - trans->block_rsv = NULL;
Why remove those 2 lines as well ?
> -
> if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs))
> btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans);
>
> @@ -923,10 +889,6 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> }
>
> kmem_cache_free(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, trans);
> - if (must_run_delayed_refs) {
> - btrfs_async_run_delayed_refs(info, cur, transid,
> - must_run_delayed_refs == 1);
> - }
> return err;
> }
>
>
