On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:21:59AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:02:42PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:02:28PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:44:47PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> > > > 
> > > > Refactor all the reflink preparation steps into a separate helper that
> > > > we'll use to land all the upcoming fixes for insufficient input checks.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> > > .....
> > > 
> > > > +xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> > > > +       struct file             *file_in,
> > > > +       loff_t                  pos_in,
> > > > +       struct file             *file_out,
> > > > +       loff_t                  pos_out,
> > > > +       u64                     len,
> > > > +       bool                    is_dedupe)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct inode            *inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
> > > > +       struct xfs_inode        *src = XFS_I(inode_in);
> > > > +       struct inode            *inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> > > > +       struct xfs_inode        *dest = XFS_I(inode_out);
> > > > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp = src->i_mount;
> > > > +       xfs_fileoff_t           sfsbno, dfsbno;
> > > > +       xfs_filblks_t           fsblen;
> > > > +       xfs_extlen_t            cowextsize;
> > > > +       ssize_t                 ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (!xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb))
> > > > +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> > > > +               return -EIO;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* Prepare and then clone file data. */
> > > > +       ret = xfs_reflink_remap_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> > > > +                       len, is_dedupe);
> > 
> > More than one bug. vfs_clone_file_prep_inodes() modifes the length
> > parameter in the case of whole file reflink by way of "len == 0"
> > on a non-zero length file. So I fixed this, too.
> 
> Did your patch look something like the attached?

Identical. I folded it back in once it tested ok, though.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

Reply via email to