Hi Filipe, On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:08 PM Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com> wrote: > > On block group remove if the corresponding extent map was on the > transaction->pending_chunks list, we were deleting the extent map > from that list, through remove_extent_mapping(), without any > synchronization with chunk allocation (which iterates that list > and adds new elements to it). Fix this by ensure that this is done > while the chunk mutex is held, since that's the mutex that protects > the list in the chunk allocation code path. > > This applies on top (depends on) of my previous patch titled: > "Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation" > > But the issue in fact was already present before that change, it only > became easier to hit after Josef's 3.18 patch that added automatic > removal of empty block groups. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index 17d429d..a7b81b4 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -9524,19 +9524,25 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct > btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > list_move_tail(&em->list, &root->fs_info->pinned_chunks); > } > spin_unlock(&block_group->lock); > - unlock_chunks(root); > > if (remove_em) { > struct extent_map_tree *em_tree; > > em_tree = &root->fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree; > write_lock(&em_tree->lock); > + /* > + * The em might be in the pending_chunks list, so make sure > the > + * chunk mutex is locked, since remove_extent_mapping() will > + * delete us from that list. > + */ > remove_extent_mapping(em_tree, em); > write_unlock(&em_tree->lock); If the "em" was in pending_chunks, it will be deleted from that list by "remove_extent_mapping". But it looks like in this case we also need to drop the extra ref on "em", which was held by pending_chunks list. I don't see it being done anywhere else. So we should check before the remove_extent_mapping() call whether "em" was in pending_chunks, and, if yes, drop the extra ref?
Thanks, Alex. > /* once for the tree */ > free_extent_map(em); > } > > + unlock_chunks(root); > + > btrfs_put_block_group(block_group); > btrfs_put_block_group(block_group); > > -- > 2.1.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html