On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:16:00PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> And to co-operate this, also delayed btrfs_drop_snapshot() call on reloc
> tree, btrfs_drop_snapshot() call will also be delayed to
> clean_dirty_subvs().

Can you please rephrase this paragraph?

> This patch will increase the size of btrfs_root by 16 bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>

> +static int clean_dirty_subvs(struct reloc_control *rc)
> +{
> +     struct btrfs_root *root;
> +     struct btrfs_root *next;
> +     int err = 0;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(root, next, &rc->dirty_subv_roots,
> +                              reloc_dirty_list) {
> +             struct btrfs_root *reloc_root = root->reloc_root;
> +
> +             clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state);
> +             list_del_init(&root->reloc_dirty_list);
> +             root->reloc_root = NULL;
> +             if (reloc_root) {
> +                     ret = btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root, NULL, 0, 1);
> +                     if (ret < 0 && !err)
> +                             err = ret;
> +             }
> +             btrfs_put_fs_root(root);
> +     }
> +     return err;

Please dont use the err/ret style but 'ret' that matches function return
type and for the temporary return values ret2 etc.

> +}

Reply via email to