On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:24:16PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Since commit d2e174d5d3ee ("btrfs: document extent mapping assumptions in
> checksum") we have a comment in place why map_private_extent_buffer() 
> can't return 1 in the csum_tree_block() case.
> 
> Make this a bit more explicit and WARN_ON() in case this this assumption
> breaks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>

Reply via email to