On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > Currently a reference to inode->i_mode is passed directly to > posix_acl_update_mode when setting an ACL which results in the inode's > mode always being changed. In case of errors (e.g. in do_set_acl or > even starting a transaction) the old mode needs to be re-assigned to > ->i_mode. This mode recovery is done only in case do_set_acl fails, > which leads to buggy behavior in case btrfs_start_transaction fails. > > Fix it by simply setting the new mode to a temporary variable which is > assigned to inode->i_mode's only when do_set_acl succeeds. This covers > both failure cases explained above. > > Fixes: db0f220e98eb ("btrfs: start transaction in btrfs_set_acl") > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/acl.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c > index b722866e1442..a0cfd2049ea5 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c > @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ static int do_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > struct inode *inode, > } > > ret = btrfs_setxattr(trans, inode, name, value, size, 0); > - > out: > kfree(value); > > @@ -112,12 +111,12 @@ static int do_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > struct inode *inode, > int btrfs_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type) > { > int ret; > - umode_t old_mode = inode->i_mode; > + umode_t mode; > struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans; > struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; > > if (type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS && acl) { > - ret = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &inode->i_mode, &acl); > + ret = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &mode, &acl); > if (ret) > return ret; > } > @@ -127,9 +126,8 @@ int btrfs_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl > *acl, int type) > return PTR_ERR(trans); > > ret = do_set_acl(trans, inode, acl, type); > - if (ret) { > - inode->i_mode = old_mode; > - } else { > + if (!ret) { > + inode->i_mode = mode;
I like this flow much better, ie. update i_mod only if it's correct, otherwise it's a no-op. Then we don't have to revert the change on each possible error. The patch that causes it is still in misc-next so the hash is not stable and we can't use it for reference. So I suggest to fold the single i_mode after transaction to "btrfs: start transaction in btrfs_set_acl" and your patch can rework the i_mode handling. We'll see when you see V2 if this could work or just go with a single patch.