On 2019/7/25 下午6:27, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
> 
> When creating a filesystem with mixed block groups, we are creating two
> space info objects to track used/reserved/pinned space, one only for data
> and another one only for metadata.
> 
> This is making fstests test case generic/416 fail, with btrfs' check
> reporting over an hundred errors about bad extents:
> 
>   (...)
>   bad extent [17186816, 17190912), type mismatch with chunk
>   bad extent [17195008, 17199104), type mismatch with chunk
>   bad extent [17203200, 17207296), type mismatch with chunk
>   (...)
> 
> Because, surprisingly, this results in block groups that do not have the
> BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA flag set but have data extents allocated in them.
> This is a regression introduced in btrfs-progs v5.2.
> 
> So fix this by making sure we only create one space info object, for both
> metadata and data, when mixed block groups are enabled.
> 
> Fixes: c31edf610cbe1e ("btrfs-progs: Fix false ENOSPC alert by tracking used 
> space correctly")
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Qu
> ---
>  mkfs/main.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mkfs/main.c b/mkfs/main.c
> index 8dbec071..971cb395 100644
> --- a/mkfs/main.c
> +++ b/mkfs/main.c
> @@ -64,18 +64,17 @@ static int create_metadata_block_groups(struct btrfs_root 
> *root, int mixed,
>       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
>       struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>       struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo;
> +     u64 flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
>       u64 bytes_used;
>       u64 chunk_start = 0;
>       u64 chunk_size = 0;
>       int ret;
>  
> +     if (mixed)
> +             flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> +
>       /* Create needed space info to trace extents reservation */
> -     ret = update_space_info(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA,
> -                             0, 0, &sinfo);
> -     if (ret < 0)
> -             return ret;
> -     ret = update_space_info(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA,
> -                             0, 0, &sinfo);
> +     ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, &sinfo);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> @@ -149,6 +148,13 @@ static int create_data_block_groups(struct 
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>       int ret = 0;
>  
>       if (!mixed) {
> +             struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo;
> +
> +             ret = update_space_info(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA,
> +                                     0, 0, &sinfo);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     return ret;
> +
>               ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, fs_info,
>                                       &chunk_start, &chunk_size,
>                                       BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA);
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to