Btrfs doesn't reuse devid, thus if we add and delete device in a loop,
we can increase devid to higher value, triggering tree checker to give a
false alert.

Furthermore, we have dev extent verification already (after
tree-checker, at mount time).
So even if user had bitflip on some dev items, we can still detect it
and refuse to mount.

Reported-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
Fixes: ab4ba2e13346 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify dev item")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
---
Changelog:
v2:
- Remove devid check completely
  As we already have verify_one_dev_extent().
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 43e488f5d063..076d5b8014fb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -686,9 +686,7 @@ static void dev_item_err(const struct extent_buffer *eb, 
int slot,
 static int check_dev_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
                          struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
 {
-       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = leaf->fs_info;
        struct btrfs_dev_item *ditem;
-       u64 max_devid = max(BTRFS_MAX_DEVS(fs_info), BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK);
 
        if (key->objectid != BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID) {
                dev_item_err(leaf, slot,
@@ -696,12 +694,6 @@ static int check_dev_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
                             key->objectid, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID);
                return -EUCLEAN;
        }
-       if (key->offset > max_devid) {
-               dev_item_err(leaf, slot,
-                            "invalid devid: has=%llu expect=[0, %llu]",
-                            key->offset, max_devid);
-               return -EUCLEAN;
-       }
        ditem = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item);
        if (btrfs_device_id(leaf, ditem) != key->offset) {
                dev_item_err(leaf, slot,
-- 
2.23.0

Reply via email to