On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 03:40:39PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For INODE_REF we will check:
> - Objectid (ino) against previous key
>   To detect missing INODE_ITEM.
> 
> - No overflow/padding in the data payload
>   Much like DIR_ITEM, but with less members to check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index 636ce1b4566e..3ce447eb591c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -842,6 +842,56 @@ static int check_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#define inode_ref_err(fs_info, eb, slot, fmt, ...)           \
> +     inode_item_err(fs_info, eb, slot, fmt, __VA_ARGS__)

I've changed that to

#define inode_ref_err(fs_info, eb, slot, fmt, args...)          \
        inode_item_err(fs_info, eb, slot, fmt, ##args)

as this is the common style for the variable macro args used in btrfs.

Reply via email to