On 22.10.19 г. 10:37 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/10/22 下午3:33, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> On 21/10/2019 17:22, David Sterba wrote:
>>> --force was added for a different reason, to allow check on a mounted
>>> filesystem. I don't think that combining --repair and --force just to
>>> allow repair is a good idea. There's a 'dangerous repair' mode for eg.
>>> xfs that allows to do live surgery on a mounted filesytem (followed by
>>> immediate reboot). We want to be able to do that eventually.
>>>
>>> I understand where the motivation comes from, let me have a second
>>> thought on that.
>>
>> So how about adding a '--yes' or '--accept', '--dangerous',
>> '--allow-dangeruos' parameter instead of force to skip the warning?
>>
>> My vote would go for '--allow-dangerous'.
>
> +1 for '--yes', at least e2fsck has a similar '-y' option.
I'\m fine with --yes/-y. It's not just e2fsck but I've seen similar
options in other tools as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> Byte,
>> Johannes
>>
