On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:09:14 +0800
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com> wrote:

> On 2021/2/10 上午1:33, Marek Behún wrote:
> > When the btrfs_read_fs_root() function is searching a ROOT_ITEM with
> > location key offset other than -1, it currently fails via BUG_ON.
> >
> > The offset can have other value than -1, though. This can happen for
> > example if a subvolume is renamed:
> >
> >    $ btrfs subvolume create X && sync
> >    Create subvolume './X'
> >    $ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree /dev/root | grep -B 2 'name: X$
> >          location key (270 ROOT_ITEM 18446744073709551615) type DIR
> >          transid 283 data_len 0 name_len 1
> >          name: X
> >    $ mv X Y && sync
> >    $ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree /dev/root | grep -B 2 'name: Y$
> >          location key (270 ROOT_ITEM 0) type DIR
> >          transid 285 data_len 0 name_len 1
> >          name: Y
> >
> > As can be seen the offset changed from -1ULL to 0.  
> 
> 
> Offset for subvolume ROOT_ITEM can be other values, especially for
> snapshot that offset is the transid when it get created.
> 
> But the problem is, if we call btrfs_read_fs_root() for subvolume tree,
> the offset of the key really doesn't matter, the only important thing is
> the objectid.
> 
> Thus we use that BUG_ON() to catch careless callers.
> 
> Would you please provide a case where we wrongly call
> btrfs_read_fs_root() with incorrect offset inside btrfs-progs/uboot?
> 
> I believe that would be the proper way to fix.

Qu,

this can be triggered in U-Boot when listing a directory containing a
subvolume that was renamed:
  - create a subvolume && sync
  - rename subvolume && sync
  - umount, reboot, list the directory containing the subvolume in
    u-boot
It will also break when you want to read a file that has a subvolume in
it's path (e.g. `read mmc 0 0x10000000 /renamed-subvol/file`).

I found out this btrfs-progs commit:
  
https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/commit/10f1af0fe7de5a0310657993c7c21a1d78087e56
This commit ensures that while searching a directory recursively, when
a ROOT_ITEM is encountered, the offset of its location is changed to -1
before passing the location to btrfs_read_fs_root().

So maybe we could do this in u-boot as well, but why do this? Linux'
btrfs driver does not check whether the offset is -1. So why do it here?

BTW, Qu, I think we have to change the BUG_ON code in U-Boot's btrfs
driver. BUG_ON in U-Boot calls a complete SOC reset. We can't break
whole U-Boot simply because btrfs partition contains broken data.
U-Boot commands must fail in such a case, not reset the SOC.

Marek

Reply via email to