On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 08:40:19AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> When btrfs-check is executed on even newly created fs, it can report
> tree blocks crossing 64K page boundary like this:
>
> Opening filesystem to check...
> Checking filesystem on /dev/test/test
> UUID: 80d734c8-dcbc-411b-9623-a10bd9e7767f
> [1/7] checking root items
> [2/7] checking extents
> WARNING: tree block [30523392, 30539776) crosses 64K page boudnary, may
> cause problem for 64K page system
> [3/7] checking free space cache
> [4/7] checking fs roots
> [5/7] checking only csums items (without verifying data)
> [6/7] checking root refs
> [7/7] checking quota groups skipped (not enabled on this FS)
> found 131072 bytes used, no error found
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 131072
> total fs tree bytes: 32768
> total extent tree bytes: 16384
> btree space waste bytes: 125199
> file data blocks allocated: 0
> referenced 0
>
> [CAUSE]
> Tree block [30523392, 30539776) is at the last 16K slot of page.
> As 30523392 % 65536 = 49152, and 30539776 % 65536 = 0.
>
> The cross boundary check is using exclusive end, which causes false
> alerts.
>
> [FIX]
> Use inclusive end to do the cross 64K boundary check.
>
> Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyu...@e16-tech.com>
> Fixes: fc38ae7f4826 ("btrfs-progs: check: detect and warn about tree blocks
> crossing 64K page boundary")
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
Thanks. I've extended the 001 test for mkfs to actually check for any
check warnings right after mkfs, covering all profiles and
single/multiple setups.
