On 14:47 Fri 26 Mar 2021, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:29:32AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:s/reponsible/responsible/So this is exactly what I don't want to see happen - one patch per typo. I tried to explain it in the previous patch, please either fix all typos under fs/btrfs or don't bother.
As I mentioned in my previous correspondence to , I have my way of doing thing . The problem is , you are getting accustomed with some specific method and you are thinking that is the "only way" of doing the "right thing" . Please , think others are also think in different way too. The goal to make it looks good and productive...don't you think so??? ..and I said I do bother ,it's just not about this specific segment but about the whole kernel. Or is it some sort of special flow brtfs subsystem are following , which I am not aware off?? Please do let me.
Description: PGP signature