WDC Red with Firmware Version: 80.00A80
Exact, 8 of thems on my array, and have forgotten to disable write cache  :/
And all that you decribed is my case.

I understand that it could be a very hard situation for expect an
massive data recovery, even if the datas are still here, the fs
structure is (partially?) crashed.

I don't have a good knowledge on btrfs structure, as i have on some
older FS, like AFS (Amiga file system) and FAT, because with childs, i
have less time to dig it (like others, we all have only 24hours by day
;)
 ).

As like i said, if anyone have encountered a similar crash, or have
any idea, i'm open to every suggestion, as the last tape backup that i
have is 5 years old, and my tape library have crashed when restored it
on a new disk. So i'm really stuck on that.

For futur raid (14Tb WD Gold x3, for the start), i wish to stay on
mdadm/raid5 an Btrfs. (because i don't have enought data on Btrfs
raid, and it seems it could have somes issues)
What is the best practice for max prenvention of this type of
corruption/crash? Snapshot stored on different disk and/or external
backup, <put any idea here>?

This is another question, but i think this time i have to minimize the
risk for this futur partition, and i have to make some diging on
internet on the subjet, but i'm convicted that this place is a far
away better place to ask for some advices thant on forums ;)

Thanks for all your time and share.
Thierry

Le mer. 31 mars 2021 à 08:14, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> a écrit :
>
> I'm going to fill in some details from the multiday conversation with
> IRC regulars. We couldn't figure out a way forward.
>
> * WDC Red with Firmware Version: 80.00A80, which is highly suspected
> to deal with power fail and write caching incorrectly, and at least on
> Btrfs apparently pretty much always drops writes for critical
> metadata.
> * A power fail / reset happened
> * No snapshots
> * --repair and --init-extent-tree  may not have done anything because
> they didn't complete
> * Less than 10% needs to be recovered and it's accepted that it can't
> be repaired. The focus is just on a limited restore, but we can't get
> past the transid failures.
>
>
> zapan@UBUNTU-SERVER:~$ sudo btrfs check --readonly /dev/md0
> Opening filesystem to check...
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040319488 wanted 524931 found 524939
> Ignoring transid failure
> Checking filesystem on /dev/md0
> UUID: f4f04e16-ce38-4a57-8434-67562a0790bd
> [1/7] checking root items
> parent transid verify failed on 23079042863104 wanted 423153 found 524931
> parent transid verify failed on 23079042863104 wanted 423153 found 524931
> Ignoring transid failure
> ERROR: child eb corrupted: parent bytenr=23079040999424 item=11 parent
> level=2 child bytenr=23079042863104 child level=0
> ERROR: failed to repair root items: Input/output error
> [2/7] checking extents
> parent transid verify failed on 23079042863104 wanted 423153 found 524931
> Ignoring transid failure
> ERROR: child eb corrupted: parent bytenr=23079040999424 item=11 parent
> level=2 child bytenr=23079042863104 child level=0
> ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
> [3/7] checking free space cache
> cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated
> [4/7] checking fs roots
> root 5 root dir 256 not found
> parent transid verify failed on 23079042863104 wanted 423153 found 524931
> Ignoring transid failure
> ERROR: child eb corrupted: parent bytenr=23079040999424 item=11 parent
> level=2 child bytenr=23079042863104 child level=0
> ERROR: errors found in fs roots
> found 0 bytes used, error(s) found
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 0
> total fs tree bytes: 0
> total extent tree bytes: 0
> btree space waste bytes: 0
> file data blocks allocated: 0
> referenced 0
>
> btrfs-find-root doesn't find many options to work with, and all of
> them fail with 'btrfs restore -t'
>
>
> zapan@UBUNTU-SERVER:~$ sudo btrfs-find-root /dev/md0
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040319488 wanted 524931 found 524939
> Ignoring transid failure
> Superblock thinks the generation is 524941
> Superblock thinks the level is 2
> Found tree root at 23079040999424 gen 524941 level 2
> Well block 23079040327680(gen: 524940 level: 2) seems good, but
> generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 524941 level: 2
> Well block 23079040389120(gen: 524939 level: 2) seems good, but
> generation/level doesn't match, want gen: 524941 level: 2
> zapan@UBUNTU-SERVER:~$ sudo btrfs restore -viD -t 23079040389120
> /dev/md0 /mnt/raid1/restore/
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040389120 wanted 524941 found 524939
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040389120 wanted 524941 found 524939
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040323584 wanted 524939 found 524941
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040323584 wanted 524939 found 524941
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040319488 wanted 524931 found 524939
> Ignoring transid failure
> This is a dry-run, no files are going to be restored
> Reached the end of the tree searching the directory
> zapan@UBUNTU-SERVER:~$ sudo btrfs restore -viD -t 23079040327680
> /dev/md0 /mnt/raid1/restore/
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040327680 wanted 524941 found 524940
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040327680 wanted 524941 found 524940
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040831488 wanted 524940 found 524941
> Ignoring transid failure
> parent transid verify failed on 23079040319488 wanted 524931 found 524939
> Ignoring transid failure
> This is a dry-run, no files are going to be restored
> Reached the end of the tree searching the directory
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Murphy

Reply via email to