Thanks for the patch, I'll take a look at building my system with it in
future.
Best wishes,
Joe
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 4:38 PM Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com
<mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>> wrote:
On 2021/4/8 下午4:16, Joe Hermaszewski wrote:
> It took a while but I managed to get hold of another one of these
> arm32 boards. Very disappointingly this exact "bitflip" is still
> present (log enclosed).
Yeah, we got to the conclusion it's not bitflip, but completely 32bit
limit on armv7.
For ARMv7, it's a 32bit system, where unsigned long is only 32bit.
This means, things like page->index is only 32bit long, and for 4K page
size, it also means all filesystems (not only btrfs) can only utilize at
most 16T bytes.
But there is pitfall for btrfs, btrfs uses its internal address space
for its meatadata, and the address space is U64.
And furthermore, for btrfs it can have metadata at bytenr way larger
than the total device size.
This is possible because btrfs maps part of its address space to real
disks, thus it can have bytenr way larger than device size.
But this brings to a problem, 32bit Linux can only handle 16T, but in
your case, some of your metadata is already beyond 16T in btrfs address
space.
Then a lot of things are going to be wrong.
I have submitted a patch to do extra check, at least allowing user to
know this is the limit of 32bit:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/patch/20210225011814.24009-1-...@suse.com/
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/patch/20210225011814.24009-1-...@suse.com/>
Unfortunately, this will not help existing fs though.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> To summarise, as it's been a while:
>
> - When running scrub, a "page_start" and "eb_start" mismatch is
> detected (off by a single bit).
> - `btrfs check` reports no significant errors on aarch64 or arm32.
> - `btrfs scrub` completes successfully on aarch64!
> - Now, I can confirm that `btrfs scrub` fails in the same manner on
> two arm32 machines.
>
> Not really sure where to go from here. The only things I can
think of are:
>
> - Bug in `btrfs scrub` on arm32 (seems unlikely given the single-bit
> error here).
> - A bitflip on the original machine wrote bad data to the disk, and
> somehow only the arm32 implementation catches this...
>
> I can give a newer kernel a try (I'm on 5.4.80 at the moment) I
suppose
>
> Best,
> Joe
>
> ```
> $ dmesg
> [ 258.791966] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on devid 4
> [ 258.792030] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on devid 1
>
> the magic generation gap you mention is
> 15, I'm more suspicious about me
>
> [ 258.792062] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on devid 2
> [ 411.849669] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 411.849786] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 218 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:531
> btree_csum_one_bio+0x22c/0x278 [btrfs]
> [ 411.849789] Modules linked in: cfg80211 rfkill 8021q ip6table_nat
> iptable_nat nf_nat xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
> nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6t_rpfilter ipt_rpfilter ip6table_raw iptable_raw
> xt_pkttype nf_log_ipv6 nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG xt_tcpudp
> ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter phy_generic uio_pdrv_genirq
> uio sch_fq_codel loop tun tap macvlan bridge stp llc lm75 ip_tables
> x_tables autofs4 dm_mod dax btrfs libcrc32c xor raid6_pq
> [ 411.849836] CPU: 0 PID: 218 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted
5.4.80 #1-NixOS
> [ 411.849838] Hardware name: Marvell Armada 380/385 (Device Tree)
> [ 411.849840] Backtrace:
> [ 411.849850] [<c010f698>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010f938>]
> (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
> [ 411.849855] r7:00000213 r6:600f0013 r5:00000000 r4:c0f8c0c4
> [ 411.849861] [<c010f918>] (show_stack) from [<c0a1bb28>]
> (dump_stack+0x98/0xac)
> [ 411.849866] [<c0a1ba90>] (dump_stack) from [<c012a998>]
(__warn+0xe0/0x108)
> [ 411.849870] r7:00000213 r6:bf058f4c r5:00000009 r4:bf120990
> [ 411.849875] [<c012a8b8>] (__warn) from [<c012ad24>]
> (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x74/0xc4)
> [ 411.849878] r7:00000213 r6:bf120990 r5:00000000 r4:e1c1c000
> [ 411.849936] [<c012acb4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<bf058f4c>]
> (btree_csum_one_bio+0x22c/0x278 [btrfs])
> [ 411.849941] r9:00000001 r8:e6afec78 r7:e1c1c000 r6:ed7f7000
> r5:00001000 r4:8fd00000
> [ 411.850044] [<bf058d20>] (btree_csum_one_bio [btrfs]) from
> [<bf059f84>] (btree_submit_bio_hook+0xe8/0x100 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850049] r10:e6afe4c0 r9:ecc57fc0 r8:ecc57f70 r7:ed7f7000
> r6:00000000 r5:c1660370
> [ 411.850051] r4:bf059e9c
> [ 411.850154] [<bf059e9c>] (btree_submit_bio_hook [btrfs]) from
> [<bf08b1ac>] (submit_one_bio+0x44/0x5c [btrfs])
> [ 411.850158] r7:ef2d58ec r6:e1c1dcac r5:00000000 r4:bf059e9c
> [ 411.850260] [<bf08b168>] (submit_one_bio [btrfs]) from
[<bf096664>]
> (btree_write_cache_pages+0x380/0x408 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850263] r5:00000000 r4:00000000
> [ 411.850366] [<bf0962e4>] (btree_write_cache_pages [btrfs]) from
> [<bf0590b8>] (btree_writepages+0x7c/0x84 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850371] r10:00000001 r9:8fd00000 r8:c0280bcc r7:e1c1c000
> r6:e1c1dd80 r5:ecc57f70
> [ 411.850373] r4:e1c1dd80
> [ 411.850428] [<bf05903c>] (btree_writepages [btrfs]) from
> [<c0284680>] (do_writepages+0x58/0xf4)
> [ 411.850431] r5:ecc57f70 r4:ecc57e68
> [ 411.850439] [<c0284628>] (do_writepages) from [<c0278b68>]
> (__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xf8/0x130)
> [ 411.850442] r8:ecc57f70 r7:00001000 r6:8fd0bfff r5:e1c1c000
r4:ecc57e68
> [ 411.850448] [<c0278a70>] (__filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
> [<c0278cf0>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x2c/0x34)
> [ 411.850452] r10:ecc57f70 r9:00001000 r8:8fd0bfff r7:e1c1de4c
> r6:e0202428 r5:00001000
> [ 411.850454] r4:8fd0bfff
> [ 411.850509] [<c0278cc4>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
> [<bf060544>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents+0x9c/0x1b0 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850512] r5:00000001 r4:00000000
> [ 411.850615] [<bf0604a8>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents [btrfs]) from
> [<bf0606f0>] (btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction+0x54/0xa4 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850620] r10:e1c1c000 r9:ed7f7010 r8:ed7f7000 r7:e0202428
> r6:ed7f7000 r5:e1c1c000
> [ 411.850621] r4:e56433f0
> [ 411.850724] [<bf06069c>] (btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction
[btrfs])
> from [<bf062428>] (btrfs_commit_transaction+0x75c/0xc94 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850728] r8:ed7f7418 r7:e0202400 r6:ed7f7000 r5:e56433f0
r4:00000000
> [ 411.850831] [<bf061ccc>] (btrfs_commit_transaction [btrfs]) from
> [<bf05cd98>] (transaction_kthread+0x19c/0x1e0 [btrfs])
> [ 411.850836] r10:ed7f728c r9:00000000 r8:001abf6a r7:00000064
> r6:ed7f7414 r5:00000bb8
> [ 411.850838] r4:ed7f7000
> [ 411.850893] [<bf05cbfc>] (transaction_kthread [btrfs]) from
> [<c014fab4>] (kthread+0x170/0x174)
> [ 411.850898] r10:ecbddbfc r9:bf05cbfc r8:ed669800 r7:e1c1c000
> r6:00000000 r5:ed560d40
> [ 411.850899] r4:ed54eb00
> [ 411.850904] [<c014f944>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>]
> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> [ 411.850907] Exception stack(0xe1c1dfb0 to 0xe1c1dff8)
> [ 411.850911] dfa0: 00000000
> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 411.850915] dfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 411.850919] dfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013
00000000
> [ 411.850923] r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:00000000
> r6:00000000 r5:c014f944
> [ 411.850925] r4:ed560d40
> [ 411.850976] ---[ end trace 1bbf4c394bd7fb26 ]---
> [ 411.850986] BTRFS warning (device sda1): page_start and eb_start
> mismatch, eb_start=17594598817792 page_start=2412773376
> [ 411.857914] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
> btrfs_commit_transaction:2279: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while
> writing out transaction)
> [ 411.869764] BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly
> [ 411.869772] BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of
aborted
> transaction.
> [ 411.869778] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
cleanup_transaction:1832:
> errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 411.877843] BTRFS info (device sda1): delayed_refs has NO entry
> [ 411.878076] BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of
aborted
> transaction.
> [ 411.882940] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting block
group ro: -30
> [ 411.882956] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished on devid
> 3 with status: -30
> [ 411.883030] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting block
group ro: -30
> [ 411.883039] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished on devid
> 4 with status: -30
> [ 411.883104] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting block
group ro: -30
> [ 411.883116] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished on devid
> 1 with status: -30
> [ 411.883191] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting block
group ro: -30
> [ 411.883200] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished on devid
> 2 with status: -30
> [ 411.953186] BTRFS info (device sda1): delayed_refs has NO entry
> [ 576.361548] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.369639] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.378477] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.386936] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.395093] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.396830] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.403153] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 576.450091] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.462821] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.474987] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.486882] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.497905] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.824673] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 576.838414] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 577.324362] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 577.337736] BTRFS error (device sda1): parent transid verify
failed
> on 12756293910528 wanted 1752939 found 1752922
> [ 578.462271] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 578.470347] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 578.479476] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 578.488099] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 578.496793] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 578.505280] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.539117] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.547207] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.556371] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.564922] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.573356] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 580.581573] BTRFS critical (device sda1): unable to find logical
> 2412789760 length 4096
> [ 581.427776] verify_parent_transid: 28 callbacks suppressed
> ... many more of these
> ```
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:30 AM Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com
<mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020/12/19 下午6:35, Joe Hermaszewski wrote:
>>> Ok, so I managed to get hold of a 64bit machine on which to run
btrfs
>>> check. `btrfs check` returns exactly the same output as the
armv7 box
>>> (no serious problems) which I suppose is good. `btrfs scrub` also
>>> finds no problems. Boring Logs below.
>>>
>>> What I don't quite understand is how the scrub problem on
armv7l is so
>>> reliable when it's not persisted on the disks, is the same physical
>>> memory location being used for this breaking value, or is it
perhaps a
>>> specific pattern of data on the bus which causes this?
>>
>> If it's so reliably reproducible, then I guess that would be the
case,
>> either a specific memory range has the problem, or a specific
pattern on
>> the bus causing the problem.
>>
>>>
>>> If it's the former, how easy would it be to find this broken
location
>>> and blacklist it? If it's the latter then I guess there's no
hope but
>>> to try replacing the psu/machine.
>>>
>>> The machine survived a couple of days of memtester (on about 95% of
>>> the RAM) and `7z b` with no problems, *shrug*
>>
>> The memtester should rule out the former case, the latter case
may be
>> resolved by newer kernel if it's not a hardware problem but a
software one.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes and thanks for the generous help so far.
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> btrfs scrub aarch64:
>>> ```
>>> [j@nixos:~]$ sudo btrfs scrub status -d /mnt
>>> UUID: b8f4ad49-29c8-4d19-a886-cef9c487f124
>>> scrub device /dev/sda1 (id 1) history
>>> Scrub started: Fri Dec 18 14:24:30 2020
>>> Status: finished
>>> Duration: 7:36:31
>>> Total to scrub: 2.40TiB
>>> Rate: 91.95MiB/s
>>> Error summary: no errors found
>>> scrub device /dev/sdb1 (id 2) history
>>> Scrub started: Fri Dec 18 14:24:30 2020
>>> Status: finished
>>> Duration: 7:12:51
>>> Total to scrub: 2.40TiB
>>> Rate: 96.90MiB/s
>>> Error summary: no errors found
>>> scrub device /dev/sdd1 (id 3) history
>>> Scrub started: Fri Dec 18 14:24:30 2020
>>> Status: finished
>>> Duration: 19:47:01
>>> Total to scrub: 7.86TiB
>>> Rate: 115.70MiB/s
>>> Error summary: no errors found
>>> scrub device /dev/sdc1 (id 4) history
>>> Scrub started: Fri Dec 18 14:24:30 2020
>>> Status: finished
>>> Duration: 19:46:38
>>> Total to scrub: 7.86TiB
>>> Rate: 115.74MiB/s
>>> Error summary: no errors found
>>> ```
>>>
>>> btrfs check aarch64:
>>> ```
>>> [nixos@nixos:/]$ sudo btrfs check --readonly /dev/sda1
>>> Opening filesystem to check...
>>> Checking filesystem on /dev/sda1
>>> UUID: b8f4ad49-29c8-4d19-a886-cef9c487f124
>>> [1/7] checking root items
>>> [2/7] checking extents
>>> [3/7] checking free space cache
>>> [4/7] checking fs roots
>>> root 294 inode 24665 errors 100, file extent discount
>>> Found file extent holes:
>>> start: 3709534208, len: 163840
>>> root 294 inode 406548 errors 100, file extent discount
>>> Found file extent holes:
>>> start: 98729984, len: 720896
>>> ERROR: errors found in fs roots
>>> found 11280701063168 bytes used, error(s) found
>>> total csum bytes: 10937464120
>>> total tree bytes: 18538053632
>>> total fs tree bytes: 5877579776
>>> total extent tree bytes: 534052864
>>> btree space waste bytes: 2316660292
>>> file data blocks allocated: 17244587220992
>>> referenced 14211684794368%
>>> ```
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 8:46 AM Qu Wenruo
<quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com <mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/11/27 下午11:15, Joe Hermaszewski wrote:
>>>>> Hi Qu,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the patch. I recompiled the kernel ran the scrub
and your
>>>>> patch worked as expected, here is the log:
>>>>>
>>>>> ```
>>>>> [ 337.365239] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on
devid 2
>>>>> [ 337.366283] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on
devid 1
>>>>> [ 337.402822] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on
devid 3
>>>>> [ 337.411944] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: started on
devid 4
>>>>> [ 471.997496] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> [ 471.997614] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 218 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:531
>>>>> btree_csum_one_bio+0x22c/0x278 [btrfs]
>>>>> [ 471.997616] Modules linked in: cfg80211 rfkill 8021q
ip6table_nat
>>>>> iptable_nat nf_nat ftdi_sio phy_generic usbserial xt_conntrack
>>>>> nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6t_rpfilter
ipt_rpfilter
>>>>> ip6table_raw uio_pdrv_genirq iptable_raw uio xt_pkttype
nf_log_ipv6
>>>>> nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG xt_tcpudp ip6table_filter
ip6_tables
>>>>> iptable_filter sch_fq_codel loop tun tap macvlan bridge stp
llc lm75
>>>>> ip_tables x_tables autofs4 dm_mod dax btrfs libcrc32c xor
raid6_pq
>>>>> [ 471.997666] CPU: 0 PID: 218 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not
tainted 5.4.78 #1-NixOS
>>>>> [ 471.997668] Hardware name: Marvell Armada 380/385 (Device
Tree)
>>>>> [ 471.997669] Backtrace:
>>>>> [ 471.997680] [<c010f698>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010f938>]
>>>>> (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>>>>> [ 471.997684] r7:00000213 r6:600c0013 r5:00000000 r4:c0f8c044
>>>>> [ 471.997691] [<c010f918>] (show_stack) from [<c0a1b848>]
>>>>> (dump_stack+0x98/0xac)
>>>>> [ 471.997696] [<c0a1b7b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c012a998>]
(__warn+0xe0/0x108)
>>>>> [ 471.997700] r7:00000213 r6:bf058f4c r5:00000009 r4:bf120990
>>>>> [ 471.997704] [<c012a8b8>] (__warn) from [<c012ad24>]
>>>>> (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x74/0xc4)
>>>>> [ 471.997707] r7:00000213 r6:bf120990 r5:00000000 r4:e1822000
>>>>> [ 471.997765] [<c012acb4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<bf058f4c>]
>>>>> (btree_csum_one_bio+0x22c/0x278 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.997770] r9:00000001 r8:c10decb8 r7:e1822000 r6:ed66b000
>>>>> r5:00001000 r4:4fd00000
>>>>> [ 471.997872] [<bf058d20>] (btree_csum_one_bio [btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<bf059f84>] (btree_submit_bio_hook+0xe8/0x100 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.997877] r10:e2197b48 r9:ec845fc0 r8:ec845f70 r7:ed66b000
>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:e2b74af0
>>>>> [ 471.997879] r4:bf059e9c
>>>>> [ 471.997981] [<bf059e9c>] (btree_submit_bio_hook [btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<bf08b1ac>] (submit_one_bio+0x44/0x5c [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.997985] r7:ef3724d4 r6:e1823cac r5:00000000 r4:bf059e9c
>>>>> [ 471.998087] [<bf08b168>] (submit_one_bio [btrfs]) from
[<bf096664>]
>>>>> (btree_write_cache_pages+0x380/0x408 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998090] r5:00000000 r4:00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998193] [<bf0962e4>] (btree_write_cache_pages [btrfs])
from
>>>>> [<bf0590b8>] (btree_writepages+0x7c/0x84 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998197] r10:00000001 r9:4fd00000 r8:c0280d14 r7:e1822000
>>>>> r6:e1823d80 r5:ec845f70
>>>>> [ 471.998199] r4:e1823d80
>>>>> [ 471.998255] [<bf05903c>] (btree_writepages [btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<c02847c8>] (do_writepages+0x58/0xf4)
>>>>> [ 471.998258] r5:ec845f70 r4:ec845e68
>>>>> [ 471.998266] [<c0284770>] (do_writepages) from [<c0278cb0>]
>>>>> (__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xf8/0x130)
>>>>> [ 471.998270] r8:ec845f70 r7:00001000 r6:4fd0bfff
r5:e1822000 r4:ec845e68
>>>>> [ 471.998275] [<c0278bb8>] (__filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
>>>>> [<c0278e38>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x2c/0x34)
>>>>> [ 471.998279] r10:ec845f70 r9:00001000 r8:4fd0bfff r7:e1823e4c
>>>>> r6:c1955e28 r5:00001000
>>>>> [ 471.998281] r4:4fd0bfff
>>>>> [ 471.998335] [<c0278e0c>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
>>>>> [<bf060544>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents+0x9c/0x1b0 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998338] r5:00000001 r4:00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998441] [<bf0604a8>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents
[btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<bf0606f0>] (btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction+0x54/0xa4 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998446] r10:e1822000 r9:ed66b010 r8:ed66b000 r7:c1955e28
>>>>> r6:ed66b000 r5:e1822000
>>>>> [ 471.998447] r4:eddc4f30
>>>>> [ 471.998551] [<bf06069c>] (btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction
[btrfs])
>>>>> from [<bf062428>] (btrfs_commit_transaction+0x75c/0xc94 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998555] r8:ed66b418 r7:c1955e00 r6:ed66b000
r5:eddc4f30 r4:00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998658] [<bf061ccc>] (btrfs_commit_transaction
[btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<bf05cd98>] (transaction_kthread+0x19c/0x1e0 [btrfs])
>>>>> [ 471.998663] r10:ed66b28c r9:00000000 r8:001aab57 r7:00000064
>>>>> r6:ed66b414 r5:00000bb8
>>>>> [ 471.998664] r4:ed66b000
>>>>> [ 471.998719] [<bf05cbfc>] (transaction_kthread [btrfs]) from
>>>>> [<c014facc>] (kthread+0x170/0x174)
>>>>> [ 471.998724] r10:ed765bfc r9:bf05cbfc r8:ed56a000 r7:e1822000
>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:ed5c8600
>>>>> [ 471.998726] r4:ed5c8740
>>>>> [ 471.998731] [<c014f95c>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>]
>>>>> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>>> [ 471.998733] Exception stack(0xe1823fb0 to 0xe1823ff8)
>>>>> [ 471.998737] 3fa0: 00000000
>>>>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998741] 3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998745] 3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000013 00000000
>>>>> [ 471.998749] r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:00000000
>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:c014f95c
>>>>> [ 471.998751] r4:ed5c8600
>>>>> [ 471.998820] ---[ end trace 6a9fb9f547659a4d ]---
>>>>> [ 471.998855] BTRFS warning (device sda1): page_start and
eb_start
>>>>> mismatch, eb_start=17593525075968 page_start=1339031552
>>>>> [ 472.015514] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
>>>>> btrfs_commit_transaction:2279: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while
>>>>> writing out transaction)
>>>>> [ 472.027321] BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly
>>>>> [ 472.027326] BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit
of aborted
>>>>> transaction.
>>>>> [ 472.027330] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
cleanup_transaction:1832:
>>>>> errno=-5 IO failure
>>>>> [ 472.035378] BTRFS info (device sda1): delayed_refs has NO
entry
>>>>> [ 472.039102] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting
block group ro: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039107] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished
on devid
>>>>> 3 with status: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039114] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished
on devid
>>>>> 4 with status: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039227] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting
block group ro: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039230] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed setting
block group ro: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039237] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished
on devid
>>>>> 2 with status: -30
>>>>> [ 472.039243] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not finished
on devid
>>>>> 1 with status: -30
>>>>> ```
>>>>>
>>>>> To rob you of the suspense:
>>>>>
>>>>> printf "0x%016x\n" (17593525075968 - 1339031552)
>>>>> 0x0000100000000000
>>>>>
>>>>> Very surprising considering that this machine has ECC ram!
>>>>
>>>> ARMv7 with ECC, and we still had such bitflip!?
>>>>
>>>> I guess everything is possible in 2020.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What would you recommend as a fix?
>>>>
>>>> It's a hardware problem, I really don't have any
recommendation at all.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you may want to request an RMA?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Qu
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Joe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 7:05 PM Qu Wenruo
<quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com <mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2020/11/26 下午6:53, Joe Hermaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Qu,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the output of btrfs check with the device unmounted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>> [root@nixos:~]# btrfs check --readonly /dev/sda1
>>>>>>> Opening filesystem to check...
>>>>>>> Checking filesystem on /dev/sda1
>>>>>>> UUID: b8f4ad49-29c8-4d19-a886-cef9c487f124
>>>>>>> [1/7] checking root items
>>>>>>> [2/7] checking extents
>>>>>>> [3/7] checking free space cache
>>>>>>> [4/7] checking fs roots
>>>>>>> root 294 inode 24665 errors 100, file extent discount
>>>>>>> Found file extent holes:
>>>>>>> start: 3709534208, len: 163840
>>>>>>> root 294 inode 406548 errors 100, file extent discount
>>>>>>> Found file extent holes:
>>>>>>> start: 0, len: 99450880
>>>>>>> ERROR: errors found in fs roots
>>>>>>> found 11279251902464 bytes used, error(s) found
>>>>>>> total csum bytes: 10935906504
>>>>>>> total tree bytes: 18455740416
>>>>>>> total fs tree bytes: 5798936576
>>>>>>> total extent tree bytes: 532250624
>>>>>>> btree space waste bytes: 2308849707
>>>>>>> file data blocks allocated: 17243418611712
>>>>>>> referenced 14210256932864
>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks the same as before...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then it means, at least your metadata is pretty safe.
Nothing really
>>>>>> needs to be worried (so far).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This also means, the problem only happens at runtime, not
something on-disk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are OK to re-compile the kernel, and the warning
message is
>>>>>> always the same at line number 531 of disk-io.c, then I
recommend the
>>>>>> attached debug diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The diff will output the found_start (from eb) and
page_start (from page).
>>>>>> If it's memory bitflip, we should have a pretty signature
diff at the
>>>>>> output.
>>>>>> If not memory bitflip, then we really have a bug to dig.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm afraid I don't have the precise details of the transid
error
>>>>>>> saved. I think I meant to write earlier that the message
that comes up
>>>>>>> now and then is the "errno=-5 IO failure (Error while
writing out
>>>>>>> transaction)". I've not seen the transid mismatch one since
the first
>>>>>>> incident, sorry for that slip-up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll try and attach to a known good system, will I have to
attach the
>>>>>>> whole array because I don't think I have that many
enclosures for the
>>>>>>> drives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You only need to mount the fs you're seeing the problem.
>>>>>> But if that fs is on multiple devices, then I guess you need
to mount
>>>>>> them all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Qu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll also run a memtest on this box.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for the helpful response.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:15 PM Qu Wenruo
<quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com <mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2020/11/25 下午11:28, Joe Hermaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a arm32 machine with four drives with a btrfs fs
spanning then in RAID1.
>>>>>>>>> The filesystem has started behaving badly recently and
I'm writing to:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Solicit advice on how best to get the system back to a
stable state
>>>>>>>>> - Report a potential bug
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ## What happened:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A couple of days ago I could no longer ssh into it, and
on the serial
>>>>>>>>> connection there were heaps of messages (and new ones
appearing with great
>>>>>>>>> frequency) along the lines of: `parent transid verify
failed on blah... wanted
>>>>>>>>> x got y`.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although I don't have a record of the precise messages I
do remember that there
>>>>>>>>> was a difference of `15` between x and y.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This normally can be a sign of unreliable HDD, which lies
on FLUSH,
>>>>>>>> killing metadata COW.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But, your btrfs check doesn't report the same problem,
thus I'm confused.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you please try to run a "btrfs check --readonly
/dev/sda1" with
>>>>>>>> the fs unmounted?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, would you provide the full dmesg of that mismatch?
>>>>>>>> The reason for the exact number is, I'm suspecting
hardware memory
>>>>>>>> corruption.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I power-cycled system and started a scrub after it
rebooted, this was
>>>>>>>>> interrupted quite promptly by several more errors in
btrfs, and the disk
>>>>>>>>> remounted RO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Every now and then in the kernel log I get messages like:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> `parent transid verify failed on blah... wanted x got y`
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not showing up in the gist dmesg though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ## Important info
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The dev stats are all zero.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here are the outputs of some btrfs commands, dmesg and
the kernel log from the
>>>>>>>>> previous two boots:
https://gist.github.com/b1beab134403c5047e2efbceb98985f9
<https://gist.github.com/b1beab134403c5047e2efbceb98985f9>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "cut here" portion of the kernel log is as follows
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158097] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158205] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 217 at
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:531
>>>>>>>>> btree_csum_one_bio+0x208/0x248 [btrfs]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The line number shows, the tree bytenr doesn't match with
the one in memory.
>>>>>>>> This is really too rare to be seen, especially when we
have no other
>>>>>>>> error reported from btrfs (at least in the gist)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since there is no other problems showing up in the gist,
it means it
>>>>>>>> could be a bit flip, considering the magic generation gap
you mention is
>>>>>>>> 15, I'm more suspicious about memory bit flip.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can provide the full parent transid mismatch error
message, it
>>>>>>>> may help to determine the possibility of hardware memory
corruption.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Qu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158208] Modules linked in: cfg80211 rfkill 8021q
ip6table_nat
>>>>>>>>> iptable_nat nf_nat xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
>>>>>>>>> nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6t_rpfilter ipt_rpfilter ip6table_raw
iptable_raw
>>>>>>>>> xt_pkttype nf_log_ipv6 nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG
xt_tcpudp
>>>>>>>>> ftdi_sio usbserial phy_generic uio_pdrv_genirq uio
ip6table_filter
>>>>>>>>> ip6_tables iptable_filter sch_fq_codel loop tun tap
macvlan bridge stp
>>>>>>>>> llc lm75 ip_tables x_tables autofs4 dm_mod dax btrfs
libcrc32c xor
>>>>>>>>> raid6_pq
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158258] CPU: 1 PID: 217 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not
tainted 5.4.77 #1-NixOS
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158260] Hardware name: Marvell Armada 380/385
(Device Tree)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158261] Backtrace:
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158272] [<c010f698>] (dump_backtrace) from
[<c010f938>]
>>>>>>>>> (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158277] r7:00000213 r6:600f0013 r5:00000000
r4:c0f8c044
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158283] [<c010f918>] (show_stack) from [<c0a1b388>]
>>>>>>>>> (dump_stack+0x98/0xac)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158288] [<c0a1b2f0>] (dump_stack) from
[<c012a998>] (__warn+0xe0/0x108)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158292] r7:00000213 r6:bf058ec8 r5:00000009
r4:bf120990
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158296] [<c012a8b8>] (__warn) from [<c012ad24>]
>>>>>>>>> (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x74/0xc4)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158300] r7:00000213 r6:bf120990 r5:00000000
r4:e2392000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158358] [<c012acb4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from
[<bf058ec8>]
>>>>>>>>> (btree_csum_one_bio+0x208/0x248 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158363] r9:e277abe0 r8:00000001 r7:e2392000
r6:ea3d17f0
>>>>>>>>> r5:00000000 r4:eefd2d3c
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158465] [<bf058cc0>] (btree_csum_one_bio [btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf059ef4>] (btree_submit_bio_hook+0xe8/0x100 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158470] r10:e32ce170 r9:ecc45fc0 r8:ecc45f70
r7:ec82b000
>>>>>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:ea3d17f0
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158472] r4:bf059e0c
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158575] [<bf059e0c>] (btree_submit_bio_hook
[btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf08b11c>] (submit_one_bio+0x44/0x5c [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158578] r7:ef36c048 r6:e2393cac r5:00000000
r4:bf059e0c
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158683] [<bf08b0d8>] (submit_one_bio [btrfs]) from
[<bf0965d4>]
>>>>>>>>> (btree_write_cache_pages+0x380/0x408 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158686] r5:00000000 r4:00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158788] [<bf096254>] (btree_write_cache_pages
[btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf059028>] (btree_writepages+0x7c/0x84 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158793] r10:00000001 r9:4fd00000 r8:c0280c94
r7:e2392000
>>>>>>>>> r6:e2393d80 r5:ecc45f70
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158794] r4:e2393d80
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158850] [<bf058fac>] (btree_writepages [btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<c0284748>] (do_writepages+0x58/0xf4)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158852] r5:ecc45f70 r4:ecc45e68
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158860] [<c02846f0>] (do_writepages) from [<c0278c30>]
>>>>>>>>> (__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xf8/0x130)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158864] r8:ecc45f70 r7:00001000 r6:4fd0bfff
r5:e2392000 r4:ecc45e68
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158869] [<c0278b38>] (__filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
>>>>>>>>> [<c0278db8>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x2c/0x34)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158874] r10:ecc45f70 r9:00001000 r8:4fd0bfff
r7:e2393e4c
>>>>>>>>> r6:c73bc628 r5:00001000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158875] r4:4fd0bfff
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158929] [<c0278d8c>] (filemap_fdatawrite_range) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf0604b4>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents+0x9c/0x1b0 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.158931] r5:00000001 r4:00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159033] [<bf060418>] (btrfs_write_marked_extents
[btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf060660>] (btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction+0x54/0xa4
[btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159038] r10:e2392000 r9:ec82b010 r8:ec82b000
r7:c73bc628
>>>>>>>>> r6:ec82b000 r5:e2392000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159040] r4:c8b81ca8
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159141] [<bf06060c>]
(btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> from [<bf062398>] (btrfs_commit_transaction+0x75c/0xc94
[btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159145] r8:ec82b418 r7:c73bc600 r6:ec82b000
r5:c8b81ca8 r4:00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159248] [<bf061c3c>] (btrfs_commit_transaction
[btrfs]) from
>>>>>>>>> [<bf05cd08>] (transaction_kthread+0x19c/0x1e0 [btrfs])
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159253] r10:ec82b28c r9:00000000 r8:001aaafa
r7:00000064
>>>>>>>>> r6:ec82b414 r5:00000bb8
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159254] r4:ec82b000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159309] [<bf05cb6c>] (transaction_kthread [btrfs])
from
>>>>>>>>> [<c014fabc>] (kthread+0x170/0x174)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159313] r10:eca87bfc r9:bf05cb6c r8:ed619000
r7:e2392000
>>>>>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:ed5ee700
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159315] r4:ed5ee1c0
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159320] [<c014f94c>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>]
>>>>>>>>> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159322] Exception stack(0xe2393fb0 to 0xe2393ff8)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159326] 3fa0:
00000000
>>>>>>>>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159331] 3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000
>>>>>>>>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159334] 3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000013 00000000
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159338] r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000
r7:00000000
>>>>>>>>> r6:00000000 r5:c014f94c
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159340] r4:ed5ee700
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.159342] ---[ end trace eea59ced12fa7859 ]---
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.165084] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
>>>>>>>>> btrfs_commit_transaction:2279: errno=-5 IO failure (Error
while
>>>>>>>>> writing out transaction)
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.176920] BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.176947] BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping
commit of aborted
>>>>>>>>> transaction.
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.176952] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in
cleanup_transaction:1832:
>>>>>>>>> errno=-5 IO failure
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.185049] BTRFS info (device sda1): delayed_refs has
NO entry
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.310199] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not
finished on devid
>>>>>>>>> 3 with status: -125
>>>>>>>>> [ 409.664880] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not
finished on devid
>>>>>>>>> 4 with status: -125
>>>>>>>>> [ 410.106791] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not
finished on devid
>>>>>>>>> 1 with status: -125
>>>>>>>>> [ 411.268585] BTRFS warning (device sda1): failed
setting block group ro: -30
>>>>>>>>> [ 411.268594] BTRFS info (device sda1): scrub: not
finished on devid
>>>>>>>>> 2 with status: -30
>>>>>>>>> [ 411.268605] BTRFS info (device sda1): delayed_refs has
NO entry
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Information requested here
>>>>>>>>>
(https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_mailing_list
<https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_mailing_list>):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>> $ uname -a
>>>>>>>>> Linux thanos 5.4.77 #1-NixOS SMP Tue Nov 10 20:13:20 UTC
2020 armv7l GNU/Linux
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ btrfs --version
>>>>>>>>> btrfs-progs v5.7
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ sudo btrfs fi show
>>>>>>>>> Label: none uuid: b8f4ad49-29c8-4d19-a886-cef9c487f124
>>>>>>>>> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 10.26TiB
>>>>>>>>> devid 1 size 3.64TiB used 2.40TiB path /dev/sda1
>>>>>>>>> devid 2 size 3.64TiB used 2.40TiB path /dev/sdc1
>>>>>>>>> devid 3 size 9.09TiB used 7.86TiB path /dev/sdd1
>>>>>>>>> devid 4 size 9.09TiB used 7.86TiB path /dev/sdb1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Label: none uuid: d02a3067-0a23-4c1f-96ac-80dbc26622f2
>>>>>>>>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 116.35MiB
>>>>>>>>> devid 1 size 399.82MiB used 224.00MiB path
/dev/sda2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ sudo btrfs fi df /
>>>>>>>>> Data, RAID1: total=10.25TiB, used=10.24TiB
>>>>>>>>> System, RAID1: total=64.00MiB, used=1.45MiB
>>>>>>>>> Metadata, RAID1: total=18.00GiB, used=17.19GiB
>>>>>>>>> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to demfloro and multicore on #btrfs for prompting
this email.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
