On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:24:55PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> v7->v8:
> - Reordered some of the patches, so that the callers of functions that added 
> new
>   error cases were fixed first, and then added the new error handler.
> - Moved a few of the ASSERT(0) to where they made sense.  Left the others that
>   are in functions that can have multiple cases of the same error that 
> indicates
>   a logic error.

With some updates in changelogs and comments moved from topic branch to
misc-next. I'm still not happy about the ASSERT(0), it should be a real
error or a real assert. We can't observe the same behaviour with asserts
enabled and disabled.

Reply via email to