On 4/15/21 7:25 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:


On 2021/4/16 上午3:03, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 4/15/21 1:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The new function, write_one_subpage_eb(), as a subroutine for subpage
metadata write, will handle the extent buffer bio submission.

The major differences between the new write_one_subpage_eb() and
write_one_eb() is:
- No page locking
   When entering write_one_subpage_eb() the page is no longerlocked.
   We only lock the page for its status update, and unlock immediately.
   Now we completely rely on extent io tree locking.

- Extra bitmap update along with page status update
   Now page dirty and writeback is controlled by
   btrfs_subpage::dirty_bitmap and btrfs_subpage::writeback_bitmap.
   They both follow the schema that any sector is dirty/writeback, then
   the full page get dirty/writeback.

- When to update the nr_written number
   Now we take a short cut, if we have cleared the last dirtybit of the
   page, we update nr_written.
   This is not completely perfect, but should emulate the oldbehavior
   good enough.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
---
  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 21a14b1cb065..f32163a465ec 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4196,6 +4196,58 @@ static void
end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage(struct bio *bio)
      bio_put(bio);
  }
+/*
+ * Unlike the work in write_one_eb(), we rely completely on extent
locking.
+ * Page locking is only utizlied at minimal to keep the VM code happy.
+ *
+ * Caller should still call write_one_eb() other than this function
directly.
+ * As write_one_eb() has extra prepration before submitting the
extent buffer.
+ */
+static int write_one_subpage_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
+                struct writeback_control *wbc,
+                struct extent_page_data *epd)
+{
+    struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
+    struct page *page = eb->pages[0];
+    unsigned int write_flags = wbc_to_write_flags(wbc) | REQ_META;
+    bool no_dirty_ebs = false;
+    int ret;
+
+    /* clear_page_dirty_for_io() in subpage helper needpage locked. */
+    lock_page(page);
+    btrfs_subpage_set_writeback(fs_info, page, eb->start, eb->len);
+
+    /* If we're the last dirty bit to update nr_written*/
+    no_dirty_ebs = btrfs_subpage_clear_and_test_dirty(fs_info, page,
+                              eb->start, eb->len);
+    if (no_dirty_ebs)
+        clear_page_dirty_for_io(page);
+
+    ret = submit_extent_page(REQ_OP_WRITE | write_flags, wbc, page,
+            eb->start, eb->len, eb->start - page_offset(page),
+            &epd->bio, end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage, 0, 0, 0,
+            false);
+    if (ret) {
+        btrfs_subpage_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, eb->start,
+                          eb->len);
+        set_btree_ioerr(page, eb);
+        unlock_page(page);
+
+        if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->io_pages))
+            end_extent_buffer_writeback(eb);
+        return -EIO;
+    }
+    unlock_page(page);
+    /*
+     * Submission finishes without problem, if no range of the page is
+     * dirty anymore, we have submitted a page.
+     * Update the nr_written in wbc.
+     */
+    if (no_dirty_ebs)
+        update_nr_written(wbc, 1);
+    return ret;
+}
+
  static noinline_for_stack int write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
              struct writeback_control *wbc,
              struct extent_page_data *epd)
@@ -4227,6 +4279,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack int
write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
          memzero_extent_buffer(eb, start, end - start);
      }
+    if (eb->fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE)
+        return write_one_subpage_eb(eb, wbc, epd);
+

Same comment here, again you're calling write_one_eb() which expects to
do the eb thing, but then later have an entirely different path for the
subpage stuff, and thus could just call your write_one_subpage_eb()
helper from there instead of stuffing it into write_one_eb().

But there are some common code before calling the subpage routine.

I don't think it's a good idea to have duplicated code between subpage
and regular routine.


Ah I missed the part at the top for zero'ing out the buffer. In that case turn that into a helper function and then keep the paths separate. Thanks,

Josef

Reply via email to