On 2021/4/17 上午1:46, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:50:47PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
This new test case is to make sure the restored image file has been
properly enlarged so that newer kernel won't complain.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
  .../047-image-restore-mount/test.sh           | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
  create mode 100755 tests/misc-tests/047-image-restore-mount/test.sh

diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/047-image-restore-mount/test.sh 
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..7f12afa2bab6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/misc-tests/047-image-restore-mount/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# Verify that the restored image of an empty btrfs can still be mounted

I've seen that in patches and comments, the use of word 'btrfs' instead
of 'filesystem' sounds a bit inappropriate to me, so I change it
whenever I see it. It's perhaps matter of taste and style, one can write
it also as 'btrfs filesystem' but that may belong to some more polished
documentation, so you can go with just 'filesystem'.

Thanks for pointing this out.

I'll use 'filesystem' from now on.


Reply via email to