On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2024-08-22 12:53:32, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2024-08-16 09:44:10, Ira Weiny wrote:

[...]

> > > > +       static const struct printf_spec range_spec = {
> > > > +               .base = 16,
> > > > +               .field_width = RANGE_PRINTK_SIZE,
> > 
> > However, my testing indicates this needs to be.
> > 
> >                 .field_width = 18, /* 2 (0x) + 2 * 8 (bytes) */
> 
> Makes sense. Great catch!

Which effectively means usage of special_hex_number().
But again, consider to unite this with %pR/r implementation(s).

> > ... to properly zero pad the value.  Does that make sense?
> >
> > > > +               .precision = -1,
> > > > +               .flags = SPECIAL | SMALL | ZEROPAD,
> > > > +       };

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Reply via email to