Andrea Parri <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fix this by using atomic_sub_return() instead of two calls. > > Seems a case for atomic_sub_return_relaxed()... why not?
Ummm... In that case, should it be atomic_sub_return_release()? David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
