"A.R. (Tom) Peters" wrote:
>
> OK, discussion on the issue Richard raised has abated, and in the old
> fashioned way I would like to put the results into a consensus point.
> Please comment if we will accept this as a policy:
>
> ========================================================================
> Consensus Point VIII: Jargon
>
> The Linux Professional Institute will not explicitly test on knowledge of
> jargon and acronyms. The examinees are supposed to be familiar with
> concepts that have a commonly used acronym for a name (e.g. TCP/IP) but
> the actual meaning of the letters will not be asked for. The tests will
> be developed to be free of jargon, abbreviations and acronyms where
> possible.
> ========================================================================
> --
> #>!$!%(@^%#%*(&(#@#*$^@^$##*#@&(%)@**$!(&!^(#((#&%!)%*@)(&$($$%(@#)&*!^$)^@*^@)
>
> Tom "thriving on chaos" Peters
> NL-1062 KD nr 149 tel. 31-204080204
> Amsterdam e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
> echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed. (Hmm. Probably need to remove CLI in favor of "console or
terminal window")
David A. Bandel
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
