[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, A.R. (Tom) Peters wrote:
>
> > I noticed that in POMS, Chuck Mead commented to Faber Fedor re. SuSE
> > (2f.82.1 Archives) to specify the version number of the distribution in
> > the objectives. I disagree,
>
> I agree with Tom. We should, in general, not mention version numbers in
> the distro-specific objectives. There may be some cases where major
> changes were made from one version to another and the objective must refer
> to the version number to clarify it's meaning. But let's try to
> de-emphasize version differences.
>
> -Scott
I agree, if there are major changes in a distro then the cert would need
to be modified, but if not, then those people who hold a certain distro
cert would still be able to perform as well with the new version. I
feel
a version should only be changed when it is determined that the people
who currently hold the cert would not be able to perform their job with
the new version unless they learn a considerable amount.
Forrest
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
