I pulled down your latest code and it doesn't appear to be patched. Am
I missing something?
----------------[snip]---------------
struct command {
int (*action)(int argc, char *argv[]);
const char name[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
const char *format;
};
----------------[snip]---------------
Now, under each field we will allocate exactly MAX_COMMAND_SIZE bytes.
During the comparison we will not walk outside the allocated area.
----------------[snip]---------------
n = strnlen(argv[1], MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
for (cmd = commands; cmd->action; cmd++) {
if (memcmp(cmd->name, argv[1], n) != 0)
continue;
----------------[snip]---------------
Regards,
Igor Druzhinin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Layton" <[email protected]>
To: "Igor Druzhinin" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Build infrastructure for storing NTLM creds in kernel keyring
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 19:43:57 +0400
"Igor Druzhinin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> First, it looks like there are some problems with newlines. The new
> files that were added seem to have CR+LF line terminators. There are
> also quite a few whitespace problems in there -- spaces leading tabs,
> etc. In general, we follow kernel coding style with cifs-utils, so
> running your patches through checkpatch.pl in the kernel sources is a
> good idea.
Checked and patched.
> Also, I don't see much need for the MULTI_LANG ifdef's. Is there any
> reason not to make it always use MULTI_LANG? If so, I'd remove the code
> that's ifdef'ed out.
Now I am still not sure of the correctness of my strategy of
internationalization. MULTI_LANG ifdef's will help me to correct
necessary
sites in case of its change.
Fair enough then...
> There are also several routines that seem to already be in libc. For
> instance, wstrtolower seems to do the same thing as towlower. I'd
> suggest using libc routines rather than rolling your own where
> possible.
As I saw in the GNU libc documentation there is no routines for
conversion
string to lowercase.
Ahh you're correct -- towlower only operates on a single character.
> That memcmp is going to walk off the end of "add". Depending on how the
> memory is allocated, it could segfault.
Patched.
I pulled down your latest code and it doesn't appear to be patched. Am
I missing something?
--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
