On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:04:15 -0600
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>
> >> I think we now have a consistent interface not only within
> >> various get/set_cifs_acl* functions but like most of the rest of of
> >> the functions
> >> i.e. they return error code and not a ptr to a structure when successful
> >> or an err ptr for failure?
> >>
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand your question. Can you rephrase it?
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> >
> 
> I meant all the get/set_cifs_acl function now return an error code
> i.e. 0 for success and non-zero for an error.

Ok, so what's the question?

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to