On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:42:16 +1100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Instead, use fatfs's method for dealing with negative dentries to
> preserve case, rather than overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate, which
> is a bit ugly and also gets in the way of doing lock-free path walking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/cifs/dir.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/cifs/dir.c      2010-11-11 18:05:55.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/cifs/dir.c   2010-11-11 18:06:49.000000000 +1100
> @@ -656,22 +656,34 @@ cifs_lookup(struct inode *parent_dir_ino
>  static int
>  cifs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *direntry, struct nameidata *nd)
>  {
> -     int isValid = 1;
> -
>       if (direntry->d_inode) {
>               if (cifs_revalidate_dentry(direntry))
>                       return 0;
> -     } else {
> -             cFYI(1, "neg dentry 0x%p name = %s",
> -                      direntry, direntry->d_name.name);
> -             if (time_after(jiffies, direntry->d_time + HZ) ||
> -                     !lookupCacheEnabled) {
> -                     d_drop(direntry);
> -                     isValid = 0;
> -             }
> +             else
> +                     return 1;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * This may be nfsd (or something), anyway, we can't see the
> +      * intent of this. So, since this can be for creation, drop it.
> +      */
> +     if (!nd)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Drop the negative dentry, in order to make sure to use the
> +      * case sensitive name which is specified by user if this is
> +      * for creation.
> +      */
> +     if (!(nd->flags & (LOOKUP_CONTINUE | LOOKUP_PARENT))) {
> +             if (nd->flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET))
> +                     return 0;
>       }
>  
> -     return isValid;
> +     if (time_after(jiffies, direntry->d_time + HZ) || !lookupCacheEnabled)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     return 1;
>  }
>  
>  /* static int cifs_d_delete(struct dentry *direntry)
> @@ -709,15 +721,8 @@ static int cifs_ci_compare(struct dentry
>       struct nls_table *codepage = CIFS_SB(dentry->d_inode->i_sb)->local_nls;
>  
>       if ((a->len == b->len) &&
> -         (nls_strnicmp(codepage, a->name, b->name, a->len) == 0)) {
> -             /*
> -              * To preserve case, don't let an existing negative dentry's
> -              * case take precedence.  If a is not a negative dentry, this
> -              * should have no side effects
> -              */
> -             memcpy((void *)a->name, b->name, a->len);
> +         (nls_strnicmp(codepage, a->name, b->name, a->len) == 0))
>               return 0;
> -     }
>       return 1;
>  }
>  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to