On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:36:44 +0300
Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Invalidate inode if we don't have at least Level II oplock and strict
> cache mode switched on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/file.c |   20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index d216879..e9f2fae 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -1812,14 +1812,24 @@ static ssize_t cifs_read(struct file *file, char 
> *read_data, size_t read_size,
>  int cifs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>       int rc, xid;
> +     struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> +     struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
>  
>       xid = GetXid();
> -     rc = cifs_revalidate_file(file);
> -     if (rc) {
> -             cFYI(1, "Validation prior to mmap failed, error=%d", rc);
> -             FreeXid(xid);
> -             return rc;
> +
> +     if (!CIFS_I(inode)->clientCanCacheRead &&
> +         (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_STRICT_IO))
> +             cifs_invalidate_mapping(inode);
> +     else {
> +             rc = cifs_revalidate_file(file);
> +             if (rc) {
> +                     cFYI(1, "Validation prior to mmap failed, error=%d",
> +                          rc);
> +                     FreeXid(xid);
> +                     return rc;
> +             }
>       }
> +
>       rc = generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
>       FreeXid(xid);
>       return rc;

Looks reasonable, though all of this special-casing sure is gross...

Might it be better to have a set of cifs_strict_file/inode_ops and use
those rather than all of these if/else conditions?

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to