On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:33:48 -0600
> Steve French <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why wouldn't we issue SMB NTCancel on these?  That way we only have to
>> wait until the timeout for the NTCancel (at worst) and can't leak midq
>> entries.
>>
>
> I suppose we could, but...
>
> a) windows doesn't do it

Windows does issue cancel requests ... even if not for exactly the same case

-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to