On Fri, 20 May 2011 13:00:53 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2011/5/19 Jeff Layton <[email protected]>:
> > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:30:17 +0400
> > Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Simplify many places when we call cifs_revalidate/invalidate to make
> >> it do what it exactly needs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/cifs/cifsfs.c |   33 +++++++++++-----
> >>  fs/cifs/cifsfs.h |    4 +-
> >>  fs/cifs/file.c   |   16 ++++++--
> >>  fs/cifs/inode.c  |  117 
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>  4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > This patch is causing a regression in tests5:
> >
> > ./test5: read and write
> >        ./test5: (/mnt/salusa/rawhide.test) 'bigfile' has size -2130066000, 
> > should be 1048576
> > basic tests failed
> >
> > Pavel, can you track this down?
> >
> > Steve, in the meantime I suggest that this patch not be pushed when
> > the merge window opens.
> >
> 
> I figured it out.
> 
> Steve, I attach two diffs: 1) diff for this version of the patch and
> 2) new fixed version of the whole patch - you can use either one that
> is more comfortable to you.
> 

Confirmed -- the patch seems to fix the issue. With that, all the
connectathon tests seem to now pass.

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to