OK - after you and shirish take a look will send this trivial delta up
as a 2nd patch (the other is already merged). I wish compiler were
smart enough to figure this out ... but Jeff's point makes sense.
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
index 5f02b4e..8f17006 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static const struct cifs_sid sid_everyone = {
1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1}, {0} };
/* security id for Authenticated Users system group */
static const struct cifs_sid sid_authusers = {
- 1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {cpu_to_le32(11)} };
+ 1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {__constant_cpu_to_le32(11)} };
/* group users */
static const struct cifs_sid sid_user = {1, 2 , {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {} };
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 23:48:45 -0500
> Steve French <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Shirish - below is a patch to fix a sparse warning in the cifsacl
>> code. The change around line 458 is cosmetic (doesn't look like the
>> original code caused a problem but at least this quiets sparse) but
>> doesn't sid_authusers have an endian error. How far back does this
>> bug go - does it affect much?
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> index 076b69c..5f02b4e 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static const struct cifs_sid sid_everyone = {
>> 1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1}, {0} };
>> /* security id for Authenticated Users system group */
>> static const struct cifs_sid sid_authusers = {
>> - 1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {11} };
>> + 1, 1, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {cpu_to_le32(11)} };
> ^^^^^^^^^
> This will break on big-endian arches. You need to use
> __constant_cpu_to_le32() instead.
>
>> /* group users */
>> static const struct cifs_sid sid_user = {1, 2 , {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5}, {} };
>>
>> @@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ int compare_sids(const struct cifs_sid *ctsid,
>> const struct cifs_sid *cwsid)
>> if (num_subauth) {
>> for (i = 0; i < num_subauth; ++i) {
>> if (ctsid->sub_auth[i] != cwsid->sub_auth[i]) {
>> - if (ctsid->sub_auth[i] > cwsid->sub_auth[i])
>> + if (le32_to_cpu(ctsid->sub_auth[i]) >
>> + le32_to_cpu(cwsid->sub_auth[i]))
>> return 1;
>> else
>> return -1;
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
